EVALUATION OF A CYST‑LIKE PULMONARY NODULE ACCORDING TO LUNG‑RADS 2022: A CASE REPORT OF CT‑GUIDED TRANSTHORACIC BIOPSY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Cystic pulmonary nodules are rare lesions with complex imaging features that may be confused with both benign and malignant conditions. Lung-RADS 2022 has updated the evaluation and classification criteria for cystic lesions, standardizing follow-up protocols and facilitating early lung cancer detection. We report a case of a female patient, 73 years old, in whom a cystic pulmonary nodule was detected during CT-based lung cancer screening. The lesion was initially categorized as Lung-RADS 4A and monitored with LDCT after 3 months according to guideline recommendations. As the nodule remained unchanged, it was subsequently reclassified as Lung-RADS 3. Although the patient was advised to continue LDCT surveillance at 6 months, she opted for a diagnostic biopsy due to significant anxiety. CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy revealed lepidic-predominant adenocarcinoma. This case highlights the application of Lung-RADS 2022 in the assessment of cystic lung nodules and demonstrates the role of CT-guided transthoracic biopsy. The procedure provided high diagnostic accuracy and enabled early treatment decisions. The integration of Lung-RADS 2022 classification with CT-guided transthoracic biopsy improves diagnostic effectiveness and supports individualized management of cystic pulmonary nodules. Although the initial management adhered to Lung-RADS 2022 recommendations, an early biopsy performed during follow-up led to the diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer. Adherence to standardized guidelines helps minimize unnecessary interventions but clinical management should be individualized to avoid missing cancers at an early stage.
Article Details
Keywords
Cystic pulmonary nodules, Lung-RADS 2022, Transthoracic biopsy, CT.
References
2. Mets OM, Schaefer-Prokop CM, de Jong PA. Cyst-related primary lung malignancies: an important and relatively unknown imaging appearance of (early) lung cancer. European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society. 2018;27(150).
3. Christensen J, Prosper AE, Wu CC, et al. ACR Lung-RADS v2022: Assessment Categories and Management Recommendations. Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR. 2024;21(3): 473-488.
4. Agrawal R, Ahuja J, Strange CD, et al. Lung-RADS v2022 Update. Radiologic clinics of North America. 2025;63(4):507-516.
5. Mascalchi M, Attinà D, Bertelli E, et al. Lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2015;39(1):102-108.
6. Farooqi AO, Cham M, Zhang L, et al. Lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2012;199(4): 781-786.
7. Fintelmann FJ, Brinkmann JK, Jeck WR, et al. Lung Cancers Associated With Cystic Airspaces: Natural History, Pathologic Correlation, and Mutational Analysis. Journal of thoracic imaging. 2017;32(3):176-188.
8. Scholten ET, Horeweg N, de Koning HJ, et al. Computed tomographic characteristics of interval and post screen carcinomas in lung cancer screening. European radiology. 2015; 25(1):81-88.