THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE SUPRACLAVICULAR ARTERY ISLAND FLAP IN RECONSTRUCTION OF PHARYNGEAL DEFECTS FOLLOWING TOTAL LARYNGOPHARYNGECTOMY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the anatomical characteristics of the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) and its suitability for pharyngeal reconstruction after total laryngopharyngectomy. Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study with two parts: (1) dissection of 15 fresh-frozen cadavers (30 flaps) to assess the origin, diameter, and length of the supraclavicular artery and the perfusion territory; (2) a clinical series of 30 patients with advanced hypopharyngeal cancer who underwent total laryngopharyngectomy, bilateral neck dissection, and pharyngeal reconstruction using SCAIF. Collected variables included T and N stage, defect size, flap dimensions, operative times, complications, and length of hospital stay; data were analyzed descriptively. Results: In 15 cadavers (30 flaps), the mean perfusion territory was 17.3 × 9.2 cm; the supraclavicular artery arose from the transverse cervical artery in 100% of cases, with a diameter of 3.1 (2.9–3.4) mm and a length of 4.3 (3.7–5.3) cm. In 30 operated patients, defect length was 8.7 (7–11) cm; harvested flap length was 18.4 (16–20) cm, with a mean skin paddle of 8.7 × 7.3 cm for reconstruction. Flap harvest time was 29.5 (20–40) minutes; mean total operative time was 184 minutes. No pharyngocutaneous fistula, surgical site infection, or mortality was observed. Mean hospital stay was 13 days. Conclusion: SCAIF demonstrates stable vascular anatomy, is straightforward to harvest, shortens operative time, and is associated with low complication rates. It is a suitable option for pharyngeal reconstruction after total laryngopharyngectomy, particularly in settings with limited microsurgical resources.
Article Details
Keywords
supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF), pharyngeal reconstruction, total laryngopharyngectomy, hypopharyngeal cancer.
References
2. Reiter M, Baumeister P. Reconstruction of laryngopharyngectomy defects: Comparison between the supraclavicular artery island flap, the radial forearm flap, and the anterolateral thigh flap. Microsurgery. 2019;39(4): 310-315. doi: 10.1002/micr.30406
3. Kokot N, Mazhar K, Reder LS, Peng GL, Sinha UK. The Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Applications and Limitations. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 139(11): 1247. doi:10.1001/jamaoto. 2013.5057
4. Emerick KS, Herr MA, Deschler DG. Supraclavicular flap reconstruction following total laryngectomy. The Laryngoscope. 2014;124(8): 1777-1782. doi:10.1002/lary.24530
5. Vinh VQ, Van Anh T, Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H. Anatomical and Clinical Studies of the Supraclavicular Flap: Analysis of 103 Flaps Used to Reconstruct Neck Scar Contractures: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2009;123(5):1471-1480. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a205ba
6. Coleman JJ, Searles JM, Hester TR, et al. Ten years experience with the free jejunal autograft. The American Journal of Surgery. 1987;154(4): 394-398. doi:10.1016/0002-9610(89)90011-1
7. Granzow JW, Suliman A, Roostaeian J, Perry A, Boyd JB. Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap (SCAIF) vs Free Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction. Otolaryngol-head neck surg. 2013;148(6): 941-948. doi:10.1177/ 0194599813476670
8. Pallua N, Kim BS. Pre-expanded Supraclavicular Artery Perforator Flap. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 2017;44(1):49-63. doi:10.1016/j.cps.2016.08.005