OUTCOMES OF CEMENTLESS TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY UTILIZING THE DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) using the Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) has demonstrated superior efficacy during the first 6 weeks post-surgery. Although it offers many advantages, DAA THA has its own disadvantages, leading to the occurrence of both intraoperative and postoperative complications. In Vietnam, several hospitals have implemented this surgical approach. However, reports on the technical results are still limited; therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy as well as the potential complications. Results: 61 patients (73 hips) underwent THA via the DAA, with early outcomes assessed during the first 3 months post-surgery. Operative time: median 70 (20.5) minutes (range: 51–127 minutes). 94% of patients were able to sit up independently in bed on the first day, 98.6% of patients began walking practice within 3 days. The acetabular abduction angle and anteversion angle were 43,9 ±5,40 and 16,4 ± 3,70, respectively. The mean Harris Hip Scores (HHS) at discharge, 6 weeks, and 3 months post-surgery were 54,98± 7,37; 81,94±11,71; 95,02±4,25 points, respectively. Complications occurred in 9/73 cases (12.3%): including 1 superficial infection, 2 wound hematomas, 2 lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injuries, 2 greater trochanter fractures, and 1 acetabular liner breakage detected at the 5th month. All complications occurred entirely within the first 50 surgical cases. Conclusion: THA-DAA is a safe and effective surgical technique. The rate of complications requiring reoperation is low (1/73). However, to minimize complications, surgeons must undergo formal and extended training compared to conventional THA techniques
Article Details
Keywords
Total Hip Arthroplasty, Direct Anterior Approach.
References
2. Kong X, Grau L, Ong A, Yang C, Chai W. Adopting the direct anterior approach: experience and learning curve in a Chinese patient population. J Orthop Surg. 2019;14(1):218. doi:10.1186/s13018-019-1272-0
3. Jungwirth-Weinberger A, Do HT, Krell EC, Valle AGD, Chalmers BP, Boettner F. Blood management in direct anterior versus posterior primary total hip arthroplasty using tranexamic acid: a matched cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;143(1):91-95. doi:10.1007/ s00402-021-03965-2
4. Dunn H, Rohlfing G, Kollmorgen R. A comparison of leg length discrepancy between direct anterior and anterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplasty. 2020;2(1):30. doi:10.1186/s42836-020-00051-7
5. Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP. Prospective Randomized Study of Direct Anterior vs Postero-Lateral Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(9):1634-1638. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.034
6. Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Seng BE, Adams JB. Enhanced Early Outcomes with the Anterior Supine Intermuscular Approach in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg. 2009; 91 (Supplement_6): 107-120. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I. 00525
7. Barnett SL, Peters DJ, Hamilton WG, Ziran NM, Gorab RS, Matta JM. Is the Anterior Approach Safe? Early Complication Rate Associated With 5090 Consecutive Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Procedures Performed Using the Anterior Approach. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(10): 2291-2294. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.008
8. Van Den Eeden Y, Van Den Eeden F. Learning curve of direct anterior total hip arthroplasty : a single surgeon experience. Acta Orthop Belg. 2018;84(3):321-330.
9. Carlson SW, Taunton MJ. Diagnosing and Managing Complications from the Anterior Approach. In: Matta JM, Sah AP, eds. Anterior Hip Replacement: From Origin to Current Advanced Techniques. Springer International Publishing; 2022: 137-146. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91896-5_12
10. Suarez JC, Rodriguez SH. The Learning Curve for the Anterior Approach: Early, Middle, and How It Continues. In: Matta JM, Sah AP, eds. Anterior Hip Replacement: From Origin to Current Advanced Techniques. Springer International Publishing; 2022:51-61. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91896-5_5