Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 12/12/2025
Abstract Views: 0
Views pdf: 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v556i2.16437
Issue
Vol. 556 No. 2 (2025)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Dương, Q. T., Võ , V. N., & Nguyễn, P. T. (2025). OUTCOMES OF POSTERIOR DENTAL IMPLANTS WITH CLOSED SINUS LIFT USING MAGNETIC MALLET. Vietnam Medical Journal, 556(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v556i2.16437

OUTCOMES OF POSTERIOR DENTAL IMPLANTS WITH CLOSED SINUS LIFT USING MAGNETIC MALLET

Quốc Thành Dương, Văn Nhân Võ , Phú Thắng Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of posterior dental implant placement with closed sinus lift using Magnetic Mallet. Materials and Methods: A controlled clinical intervention study was conducted on 24 patients, including 20 implant sites using Magnetic Mallet (Group 1) and 20 implant sites using the CAS-kit (Group 2), from June 2023 to August 2024. Results: Postoperative outcomes showed that all implants achieved good primary stability, with most initial stability values ranging from 30-35 Ncm in both groups. Immediately after surgery, changes in sinus membrane thickness showed no significant difference between the two groups. However, bone dimensions increased in both groups, with Group 1 showing greater bone gain compared to Group 2 (p < 0.05). After 3 months, bone dimensions in both groups decreased, indicating that bone resorption exceeded bone formation. Nevertheless, 100% of implants exhibited radiopaque margins, suggesting evidence of osseointegration on CBCT images. Conclusion: The results demonstrated relatively favorable outcomes for the use of Magnetic Mallet in closed sinus lift compared with the CAS-kit.

Article Details

Keywords

dental implant, closed sinus lift, Magnetic Mallet, posterior teeth.

References

1. Quirynen M, Naert I, Van Steenberghe D, Teerlinck J, Dekeyser C, Theuniers G. Periodontal Aspects Of Osseointegrated Fixtures Supporting An Overdenture. A 4-Year Retrospective Study. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:719–728.
2. Summers R. A New Concept In Maxillary Implant Surgery: The Osteotome Technique. Compendium Of Continuing Education. 1994; 15: 152-156.
3. Esfahanizadeh N, Rokn Ar, Paknejad P, Et Al. Comparison Of Lateral Window And Osteotome Techniques In Sinus Augmentation Histological And Histomorphometric Evaluation. Journal Of Dentistry. 2012; 9: 237-246
4. Garg A: Augmentation Grafting Of The Maxillary Sinus For The Placement Of Dental Implants: Anatomy, Physiology, And Procedure. Implant Dent 8:36, 1994
5. Kraut R, Kesler H: Quantification Of Bone In Dental Implant Sites After Composite Grafting Of The Mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 4:143, 1989
6. Michael R Norton, The influence of insertion torque on the survival of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2013, 26(6):1333-43.
7. Yang, Q.; Guan, X.; Wang, B.; Zhang, D.; Bai, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y. Implant survival rate and marginal bone loss with the all-on-4 immediate-loading strategy: A clinical retrospective study with 1 to 4 years of follow-up. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2023, 130, 849–857
8. Bizzi, I.H.; Menezes da Silveira, T.; Bitencourt, F.V.; Gomes Muniz, F.W.M.; Cavagni, J.; Fiorini, T. Primary stability of immediate implants placed in fresh sockets in comparison with healed sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Oral Implantol. 2025, 18, 33
9. Roberto Crespi, Paolo Capparè, Enrico Gherlone: Electrical mallet provides essential advantages in maxillary bone condensing. A prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2013, 15 (6):874-85.