EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY USING THE CAPOX REGIMEN IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER AT K HOSPITAL

Hồng Trường Nguyễn, Quang Toản Vũ, Trần Doanh Vi, Thị Thùy Trang Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate treatment response and adverse events in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with the CAPOX regimen at K Hospital. Subjects and Methods: This descriptive study included 102 patients with unresectable esophageal cancer treated at K Hospital. Results: The mean age was 61.7 ± 7.9 years. The male-to-female ratio was 50:1. The middle third of the esophagus was the most frequent tumor site (44.2%). Disease stages II, III, and IVA accounted for 33.3%, 62.7%, and 3.9% of cases, respectively. The mean chemotherapy dose intensity was 95.0 ± 1.5%. Radiotherapy interruptions < 7 days and ≥ 7 days were 53.9% and 46.1%, respectively. The rates of complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were 31.4%, 58.8%, 6.9%, and 2.9%, respectively. Response rates were significantly higher in earlier-stage tumors and in patients without regional lymph node metastasis (p < 0.05). Response rates were higher in patients with earlier-stage disease and without regional lymph node metastasis (p < 0.05). The most common hematologic toxicities were: anemia (43.1%), leukopenia (32.3%), and thrombocytopenia (36.3%). Early radiation-related complications included esophagitis (52.0%), dermatitis (48.1%), pneumonitis (12.8%), and esophageal fistula (1.0%). Conclusion: Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with the CAPOX regimen achieved favorable response outcomes with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Article Details

References

Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. "Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries", CA Cancer J Clin, (2024) 74 (3), pp. 229-263.
2. Bộ Y tế. “Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị ung thư thực quản. Ban hành kèm theo Quyết định số 1514/QĐ-BYT ngày 01 tháng 04 năm 2020 của Bộ trưởng Bộ Y tế” (2020), Tr. 265-280.
3. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. "New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)", Eur J Cancer, (2009), 45 (2), pp. 228-47.
4. Freites-Martinez A, Santana N, Arias-Santiago S, et al. (2021), "Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE - Version 5.0) to Evaluate the Severity of Adverse Events of Anticancer Therapies", Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed), 112 (1), pp. 90-92.
5. Nguyễn Quang Hưng, Nguyễn Tuyết Mai và cộng sự. "So sánh kết quả lâu dài giữa hóa xạ trị đồng thời phác đồ FOLFOX so với phác đồ CF trong điều trị ung thư thực quản giai đoạn không mổ được tại Bệnh viện K và Bệnh viện ung bướu tỉnh Thanh Hóa", Tạp chí y học Việt Nam, (2022) 517, tr. 84-88.
6. Jia R, Shan T, Zheng A, et al. "Capecitabine or Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Versus Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin in Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (CRTCOESC): A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial", J Clin Oncol, (2024), 42 (20), pp. 2436-2445.
7. Conroy T, Galais MP, Raoul JL, et al. (2014), "Definitive chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX versus fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with oesophageal cancer (PRODIGE5/ACCORD17): final results of a randomised, phase 2/3 trial", Lancet Oncol, 15 (3), pp. 305-14.
8. Phan Hữu Kiệm. "Nhận xét đáp ứng bước đầu của phác đồ FOLFOX6 kết hợp đồng thời xạ trị ung thư thực quản tại Bệnh viện K", Luận văn Thạc sĩ Y học, Đại học Y Hà Nội, (2021).
9. Xu H, Lin M, Hu Y, et al. "Lymphopenia During Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Association with Dosimetric Parameters and Patient Outcomes", The Oncologist, (2020), 26 (3), pp. e425-e434.