Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 15/12/2025
Abstract Views: 0
Views pdf: 0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v556i3.16466
Issue
Vol. 556 No. 3 (2025)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, C. B., Vũ, T. H. A., & Nguyễn, N. N. (2025). RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR OF PERFORATED GASTRIC - DUODENAL ULERS AT SON LA PROVINCE GENERAL HOSPITAL. Vietnam Medical Journal, 556(3). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v556i3.16466

RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR OF PERFORATED GASTRIC - DUODENAL ULERS AT SON LA PROVINCE GENERAL HOSPITAL

Công Bằng Nguyễn, Thị Hồng Anh Vũ, Ngọc Nghĩa Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the surgery results of laparoscopic surgery to suture perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers at Son La Province General Hospital and some influencing factors. Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted on 63 patients undergoing laparoscopic perforation surgery at Son La General Hospital during the period from January 2023 to June 2025. Results: The results lapaoscopic surgery were 87,3% good, 16,9% were Pretty good results and poor in 1.6%; There were 6.3% surgical site infections, 6.3% pneumonia and 1 case (1.6%) death due to pneumonia and stroke; the average hospital stay was 7.44 days. Using ERAS program shortened average treatment days and increased good results. There was a correlation between ASA classification, perforation size, ERAS program application and early surgical outcome. Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery is an effective treatment method for gastric - duodenal ulcers perforation with a short hospital stay, safe, feasibility and high aesthetics. ERAS programs should be implemented to increase the rate of good surgical outcomes.

Article Details

Keywords

Gastric and duoenal uler, ulcer perforation, laparoscopic surgery, Son La.

References

Chung KT, Shelat VG. Perforated peptic ulcer - an update. World journal of gastrointestinal surgery. Jan 27 2017. 9(1):1-12. doi:10.4240/ wjgs.v9.i1.1.
2. Weledji EP. An Overview of Gastroduodenal Perforation. Frontiers in surgery. 2020. 7:573901. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2020.573901.
3. Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội - Bộ môn Ngoại. Bệnh học ngoại khoa tiêu hóa. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Y học; 2021.
4. Lanas A, Chan FKL. Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet (London, England). Aug 5 2017. 390(10094):613-624. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32404-7.
5. Trí NH. Nghiên cứu ứng dụng phẫu thuật nội soi một cổng khâu lỗ thủng ổ loét dạ dày. 2017. Trường đại học Y Dược Huế, Huế.
6. Tùng NT. Nghiên cứu kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi khâu lỗ thủng ổ loét dạ dày tá tràng tại bệnh viện Đa khoa tỉnh Bắc Ninh. 2015. Đại học Y Dược Thái Nguyên, Thái Nguyên.
7. Quyết HV. Thủng ổ loét dạ dày - tá tràng, Bệnh học Ngoại khoa. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản y học; 2016.
8. Kazunori Nagashima, Keiichi Tominaga, Koh Fukus et al. Recent trends in the occurrence of bleeding gastric and duodenal ulcers under the Japanese evidence‐based clinical practice guideline for peptic ulcer disease. JGH Open. 2018. 2(6):255-261.
9. Phạm Văn Thắng. Kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi khâu lỗ thủng ổ loét dạ dày – tá tràng tại bệnh viện Đa khoa tỉnh Bắc Kạn. 2024. Trường đại học Y Dược - Đại học Thái Nguyên, Thái Nguyên.
10. Bertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial. World J Surg. 2009. 33(7):1368-1373.