CLINICAL, SUBCLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND RELATED FACTORS OF PATIENTS WITH MAXILLOFACIAL CELLULITIS RECEIVED INPATIENT TREATMENT AT NGUYEN TRAI HOSPITAL, HO CHI MINH CITY

Thị Diễm Nguyễn, Minh Thịnh Phùng, Minh Tiến Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the clinical and subclinical characteristics and related factors of patients  with maxillofacial cellulitis received inpatient treatment at Nguyen Trai hospital, Ho Chi Minh city. Methods: A cross-sectional study were performed in 46 patients, aged from 18 years old, at Nguyen Trai hospital, Ho Chi Minh city from June 2024 to September 2024. Bassed on the classification of the level of infection such as age, gender, clinical signs, cause, clinical progression, treatment methods and healing progression during follow-up. Severity criteria used in this study were anatomical structure, dysphagia, dysarthria, dyspnea, fever, sepsis, and tissue necrosis. Analyze data using Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test and T-test, with p<0.05, CI95%. Results: Participants had age average 57.5±16.4, 47.8% female. Regarding severity, mild  severity accounted for 52.2%; 30.4% moderate; 10.8% severe and 6.6% very severe. Symptoms of swelling and pain account for a high rate of 95.7% and 93.5%, respectively. The causes are pulp necrosis and periodontitis accounting for 30.4%. Patients in the severe and very severe groups with dysphagia and abuse of alcohol and tobacco, days of taking antibiotics and length of hospital stay had statistically significant differences compared to the mild-moderate group, (p<0.05). Conclusion: Maxillofacial cellulitis is a condition that can be life-threatening. This condition can be successfully treated as the disease is promptly diagnosed, the cause is eliminated and effectively drained, as well as the causative bacteria are identified in order to use the most appropriate antibiotic therapy.

Article Details

References

1. Di He, et al (2021), Multifunctional Irrigation-Assisted Vacuum Irrigation-Assisted versus Traditional Drainage in the Treatment of Odontogenic Deep Fascial Infection A Retrospective Cohort Study”, Infection and Drug Resistance 2021:14 3571–3580
2. Furuholm J. et al (2021), Health status in patients hospitalised for severe odontogenic infections, Acta odontologica Scandinavica 2021, Vol 79, No 6,436-442 https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00016357.2021.1876916
3. Kang E.S. et al (2022), Diagnostic value of presepsin
in odontogenic infection: a retrospective study, Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (2022) 44:22 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-022-00353-7
4. Nathalie P. D. et al (2020), Five Predictors Affecting the Prognosis of Patients with Severe Odontogenic Infections, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8917; doi:10.3390/ijerph17238917 Bohimbo J.G.E et al (2023), Severity scale of cervicofacial cellulitis with a clinical experience
5. Rasteniene R. et al (2023), Non-odontogenic maxillofacial infections – a 17-years retrospective cohort study, Oral and maxillofacial surgery, pp.1-5
6. Timothy W N. et al (2022), Complications of Severe Odontogenic Infections: A Review, Biology, 11, 1784. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology 11121784
7. Vytla S. et al (2017), Clinical guideline for the management of odontogenicinfections in the tertiary setting, Australian Dental Journal, 62, pp. 464-470
8. Weise H. et al (2019), Severe odontogenic infections with septic progress – a constant and increasing challenge: a retrospective analysis, Clin Oral Invest, 12 Suppl 1, pp.65 – 68