IMPACT OF COLD ISCHEMIA TIME ON HER2 EXPRESSION IN BREAST CANCER
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: HER2 (ERBB2) is a receptor tyrosine kinase expressed on the tumor cell membrane and is the therapeutic target of multiple anti-HER2 agents. As a membrane antigen, HER2 immunoreactivity is highly susceptible to pre-analytical variables, particularly cold ischemia time (CIT). Prolonged CIT can induce membrane injury, protein degradation and epitope masking, leading to loss of membranous continuity, attenuation of staining intensity, and inaccurate IHC readouts, with direct implications for treatment selection. Objectives: To assess the impact of CIT on HER2 expression in breast carcinoma by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Subjects and Methods: Exploratory study with purposive sampling. Tumor tissue was grossed into ~3-mm slices and placed into 10% neutral buffered formalin (10% NBF; ~4% formaldehyde, phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) at six CIT points: <1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h, and 8 h. Specimens were then fixed for 8–32 h, processed routinely, sectioned at 3–4 µm, stained for HER2 IHC, and scored per ASCO/CAP criteria (0/1+/2+/3+). Endpoints included staining intensity, percentage of HER2-positive tumor cells, and the proportion of tumor cells with discontinuous/indistinct membranous staining (“membrane disruption”). Results: In HER2 (3+) cases, no decline in staining intensity was observed between the earliest and latest CIT points. In HER2 (2+) cases, some shifted to HER2 (1+) with prolonged CIT; no case demonstrated complete loss of expression. The percent positivity and rate of membrane disruption fluctuated slightly but without a consistent linear trend across the <1–8 h CIT window. Conclusions: Under these study conditions, HER2 (3+) immunoreactivity appears relatively stable despite CIT extension, whereas borderline HER2 (2+) cases are more vulnerable to attenuation of membranous staining, risking under-calling (with potential implications for HER2-low categorization and therapy). Strict adherence to ASCO/CAP pre-analytical recommendations – CIT ≤ 1 hour, gross slice thickness 2–3 mm, and standardized fixation – is essential to preserve membrane epitopes and ensure reliable HER2 IHC interpretation.
Article Details
Keywords
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2); cold ischemia time; breast carcinoma; immunohistochemistry
References
2. Yaziji H, Taylor CR, Goldstein NS, et al. Consensus recommendations on estrogen receptor testing in breast cancer by immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2008; 16:513–520.
3. Rimm DL, et al. Tissue microarray: a new technology for amplification of tissue resources. Cancer J. 2001; 7(1):24-31.
4. Neumeister VM, Anagnostou V, Siddiqui S, et al. Quantitative assessment of effect of preanalytic cold ischemic time on protein expression in breast cancer tissues. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(23): 1815-1824. doi:10.1093/ jnci/djs438.
5. Pinhel IF, Macneill FA, Hills MJ, Salter J, Detre S, A'hern R, Nerurkar A, Osin P, Smith IE, Dowsett M. Extreme loss of immunoreactive p-Akt and p-Erk1/2 during routine fixation of primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(5):R76.
6. Khoury T, Sait S, Hwang H, et al. Delay to formalin fixation effect on breast biomarkers. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(11): 1457-1467. doi:10.1038/ modpathol.2009.117.
7. Moatamed NA, Nanjangud G, Pucci R, et al. Effect of ischemic time, fixation time, and fixative type on HER2/neu immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization results in breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136(5):754-761. doi:10.1309/AJCP99WZGBPKCXOQ.
8. Pekmezci M, Szpaderska A, Osipo C, Erşahin C. The Effect of Cold Ischemia Time and/or Formalin Fixation on Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Results in Breast Carcinoma. Patholog Res Int. 2012;2012:947041. doi:10.1155/2012/947041.
9. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(31):3997-4013. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984.
10. Khoury T, Zirpoli G, Cohen SM, et al. Ki-67 Expression in Breast Cancer Tissue Microarrays: Assessing Tumor Heterogeneity, Concordance With Full Section, and Scoring Methods. Am J Clin Pathol. 2017;148(2): 108-118. doi:10.1093/ajcp/ aqx053.