CLINICAL, RADIOGRAPHIC, AND ULTRASONOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANTAR FASCIITIS

Thị Thùy Linh Đỗ, Thị Hương Trang Tạ, Thị Phương Thủy Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the clinical characteristics, radiographic, and ultrasound imaging findings in a group of patients with plantar fasciitis. Subjects: 64 patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis according to the diagnostic criteria of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), recruited at the Musculoskeletal Center of Bach Mai Hospital from August 2024 to May 2025. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study. Patients underwent clinical examination, X-ray imaging, and ultrasound of the plantar fascia based on predefined research criteria. Results: Among the study population, 87.5% were female, with a mean age of 54 years at disease onset. A majority of patients (70.3%) were engaged in occupations involving physical labor, particularly those requiring prolonged standing and walking. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 22.8, with 51.5% of patients classified as overweight. Flatfoot deformity was identified in 35.9% of patients, while calcaneal spurs were detected on plain radiographs in 34.4% of cases. On ultrasound examination of the plantar fascia, hypoechogenicity and fascial thickening were observed in 98.4% and 75.0% of patients, respectively. The mean thickness of the plantar fascia was 4.9 mm. Conclusion: Plantar fasciitis is a common condition that causes heel pain, primarily affecting middle-aged women. It is often associated with occupational factors and being overweight. Diagnosis requires a combination of clinical symptoms and ultrasound imaging, whereas the presence of calcaneal spurs on X-ray has limited diagnostic significance.

Article Details

References

Heel Pain—Plantar Fasciitis: Revision 2014. doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.0303
2. Buchanan BK, Sina RE, Kushner D. Plantar Fasciitis. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Accessed June 11, 2024. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK431073/
3. Rhim HC, Kwon J, Park J, Borg-Stein J, Tenforde AS. A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on the Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. Life. 2021;11(12): 1287. doi:10.3390/life11121287
4. Van Lieshout EMM, De Boer AS, Meuffels DE, et al. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score: a study protocol for the translation and validation of the Dutch language version. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e012884. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012884
5. Wong CK, Weil R, de Boer E. Standardizing Foot-Type Classification Using Arch Index Values. Physiother Can. 2012;64(3):280-283. doi:10. 3138/ptc.2011-40
6. McNally EG, Shetty S. Plantar Fascia: Imaging Diagnosis and Guided Treatment. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010;14:334-343. doi:10. 1055/s-0030-1254522
7. Franceschi F, Papalia R, Paciotti M, et al. Obesity as a Risk Factor for Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014: 670262. doi:10.1155/2014/670262
8. Waclawski ER, Beach J, Milne A, Yacyshyn E, Dryden DM. Systematic review: plantar fasciitis and prolonged weight bearing. Occup Med Oxf Engl. 2015;65(2):97-106. doi:10.1093/ occmed/kqu177
9. Wearing SC, Smeathers JE, Urry SR, Hennig EM, Hills AP. The pathomechanics of plantar fasciitis. Sports Med Auckl NZ. 2006;36(7):585-611. doi:10.2165/00007256-200636070-00004
10. Jiang ZZ, Shen HL, Zhang Q, Ye G, Li XC, Liu XT. Elasticity evaluation of the plantar fascia: A shear wave elastography study involving 33 early-stage plantar fasciopathy subjects. Front Physiol. 2022;13: 1060728. doi:10.3389/fphys.2022. 1060728