INDICATIONS AND RESULTS OF DIGITAL FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RENAL STONES AT BACH MAI HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the indications and outcomes of renal stone management using digital flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) at Bach Mai Hospital. Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 123 patients who underwent digital fURS between May 2023 and July 2025. Parameters included indications, operative time, stone-free rate immediately after surgery and at 1 month, ureteral injury according to the Traxer classification, hospital stay, and JJ stent duration. Results: Digital fURS was mainly indicated for patients with lower pole stones (56.9%) and renal pelvic stones (52.0%), with a mean stone size of 12.9 ± 4.5 mm. Most patients presented with lumbar pain (98.4%) and had no prior surgical intervention (87.0%). The mean operative time was 65.04 ± 22.57 minutes, including a mean lithotripsy time of 49.68 ± 21.61 minutes. The stone-free rate (≤ 4 mm) was 75.6% immediately after surgery and increased to 87.8% at 1 month (p < 0.01). No ureteral injuries of grade ≥2 were recorded; the majority were grade 1 abrasions (69.9%). The mean hospital stay was 4.89 ± 4.51 days, with most patients discharged within 3–4 days (70.7%). The mean JJ stent duration was 14.04 ± 8.32 days, mostly 8–14 days (65.9%). Conclusion: Digital fURS is a safe and effective treatment for renal stones, with a high stone-free rate, minimal complications, and rapid recovery. It is suitable for broader implementation in tertiary urological centers in Vietnam.
Article Details
Keywords
renal stone, flexible ureteroscopy, digital lithotripsy, Bach Mai Hospital.
References
2. Meng C, Peng L, Li J, Li Y, Li J, Wu J. Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Surgery. 2021;8. Accessed November 21, 2022. https://www.fron tiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.691170
3. Hùng PN, Việt PHQ, Cẩn TV, et al. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị sỏi đài thận dưới đơn thuần ≤ 2 cm bằng nội soi niệu quản ngược dòng ống mềm tán sỏi thận tại Bệnh Viện Trung Ương Huế. Tạp chí Y học lâm sàng Bệnh viện Trung Ương Huế. 2023;(88):12-17. doi:10.38103/jcmhch.88.2
4. Gao X, Zhang Z, Li X, et al. High stone-free rate immediately after suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with Intelligent pressure-control in treating upper urinary tract calculi. BMC Urology. 2022; 22(1):180. doi:10.1186/s12894-022-01126-0
5. Geavlete P, Multescu R, Geavlete B. Influence of pyelocaliceal anatomy on the success of flexible ureteroscopic approach. J Endourol. 2008;22(10): 2235-2239. doi:10.1089/end. 2008.9719
6. York NE, Zheng M, Elmansy HM, Rivera ME, Krambeck AE, Lingeman JE. Stone-free Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Calculi Utilizing Computed Tomography Imaging. Urology. 2019;124:52-56. doi:10.1016/j.urology. 2018.09.005
7. Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013; 189(2):580-584. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197
8. Mitroi GF, Drăgoescu PO, Mitroi MR, et al. Clinical Outcomes and Safety Assessment of Flexible Ureteroscopy as an Outpatient Procedure: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Life. 2024;14(9):1131. doi:10.3390/life14091131