CHARACTERISTICS OF DIFFICULT-TO-TREAT KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE AMONG COVID-19 PATIENTS AT HO CHI MINH CITY TROPICAL DISEASES HOSPITAL

Thị Quỳnh Ngân Lê, Quang Minh Hồ, Đình Hiếu Nguyễn, Thị Ngọc Nị Nguyễn, Nữ Khánh Uyên Trần, Phú Hương Lan Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Description of K. pneumoniae DTR infection in COVID-19 patients, microbiological characteristics, carbapenemase genotype and treatment outcomes. Subjects and methods: COVID-19 patients with K. pneumoniae infection, from August 2021 to April 2022, at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases of Ho Chi Minh City.Retrospective descriptive analysis. Results: Among the 155 COVID-19 patients including in the study, 280 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were identified. Of which, 28.2% were isolated from blood culture samples and sterile fluids, 55.0% from lower respiratory specimens, and 16.8% from other specimens (urine, wound pus). K. pneumoniae was found in 18.1% of patients in two different specimens, and in 1.9% in all three specimens. The rate of cases infected with K. pneumoniae DTR strain was 84.6%, of which K. pneumoniae isolated from lower respiratory specimens had the highest DTR rate of 86.1%. The rate of K. pneumoniae DTR resistant to ertapenem was 84.6%, and resistance to imipenem and meropenem was 83.9%. Among K. pneumoniae DTR. strains, 56.0% of strains carried the OXA-48 gene, 18.0% of strains carried the OXA-48 and NDM genes. For the lower respiratory tract group, 55.5% carried the OXA-48 gene, 16.6% carried both the OXA-48 and NDM genes, and 16.6% had none of the 5 genes examined. Other specimens (urine, wound pus) had 44.4% of cases carrying the OXA-48 gene, 33.3% of cases had NDM, and 0.27% of cases had both genes (OXA-48+NDM/IMP). For blood specimens, 70.0% carried the single OXA-48 gene, 30.0% had both OXA-48 and NDM. 65.8% of patients infected with K. pneumoniae DTR died. No association between genotype and mortality was noted.

Article Details

References

Tesfa T, Mitiku H, Edae M, Assefa N. Prevalence and incidence of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae colonization: systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic reviews. 2022; 11(1):240.
2. Wu C, Zheng L, Yao J. Analysis of Risk Factors and Mortality of Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection. Infection and drug resistance. 2022;15:2383-2391.
3. Kadri SS, Adjemian J, Lai YL, et al. Difficult-to-Treat Resistance in Gram-negative Bacteremia at 173 US Hospitals: Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcome of Resistance to All First-line Agents. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(12):1803-1814.
4. Bengoechea JA, Bamford CG. SARS-CoV-2, bacterial co-infections, and AMR: the deadly trio in COVID-19? EMBO molecular medicine. 2020;12(7):e12560.
5. Linh TD, Thu NH, Shibayama K, et al. Expansion of KPC-producing Enterobacterales in four large hospitals in Hanoi, Vietnam. Journal of global antimicrobial resistance. 2021;27:200-211.
6. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(2):187-212.
7. Pudpong K, Pattharachayakul S, Santimaleeworagun W, et al. Association Between Types of Carbapenemase and Clinical Outcomes of Infection Due to Carbapenem Resistance Enterobacterales. Infection and drug resistance. 2022;15:3025-3037.