OUTCOMES OF IMPLEMENTING THE PIT-CREW MODEL IN CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION

Trường Sơn Nguyễn, Tuấn Đạt Nguyễn, Bùi Hải Hoàng

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Cardiac arrest (CA) is a critical emergency condition with a high mortality rate, in which high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains the most effective intervention. The “pit-crew” resuscitation model assigns clearly defined roles to each member of the resuscitation team. Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of cardiac arrest resuscitation using the pit-crew model in selected hospitals. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted by reviewing medical records at Hanoi Medical University Hospital and Bach Mai Hospital from August 2024 to June 2025. Results: A total of 35 CA patients were resuscitated under the pit-crew model, with a mean age of 59.7 ± 15.3 years (range: 19–83); 68.6% were male. The return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate was 57.1%. Patients with strict adherence to the model achieved a higher ROSC rate (66.7%) compared to those with poor adherence (42.9%; p = 0.187). The model demonstrated advantages in rapid initiation (<10 seconds) and equipment preparation (100%). However, several limitations were observed: 22.9% of resuscitations lacked the full number of team members, 28.6% of participants were unclear about their assigned tasks, chest compression frequency was consistently maintained but interruptions ≥10 seconds occurred in 11.4%, and 14.3% failed to achieve ≥80% compression fraction. Only 5.7% of patients were discharged with favorable neurological outcomes, while 17.1% required prolonged mechanical ventilation. Conclusion: The pit-crew resuscitation model shows considerable potential in cardiac arrest management; however, enhanced training in team coordination and post-resuscitation care is needed to improve patient outcomes.

Article Details

References

1. Ait Hssain A, Chalkias A, Vahedian-Azimi A, et al. Survival rates with favorable neurological outcomes after in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective cohort study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025;87:103889. doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103889
2. Đỗ Ngọc Sơn, Lương Quốc Chính, Phạm Thị Dung, và cộng sự. Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Viet Nam: multicentre prospective cohort study. Bull World Health Organ. 2021;99(1):50-61. doi:10.2471/blt.20.269837
3. Nehme Z, Andrew E, Bernard S, Smith K. Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration on survival from paramedic witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: An observational study. Resuscitation. 2016;100:25-31. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.12.011
4. Ornato JP, Peberdy MA, Reid RD, Feeser VR, Dhindsa HS; National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Investigators. Impact of resuscitation system errors on survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2012; 83(1): 63-69. doi:10. 1016/j.resuscitation. 2011.09.009
5. Hopkins CL, Burk C, Moser S, Meersman J, Baldwin C, Youngquist ST. Implementation of pit crew approach and cardiopulmonary resuscitation metrics for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest improves patient survival and neurological outcome. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(1):e002892. doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.002892
6. Lê Bảo Huy, Nguyễn Thị Thu Hương, Trần Thị Luận, và cộng sự. Nhận xét tình hình cấp cứu ngưng tuần hoàn hô hấp trước khi vào viện tại Khoa Cấp cứu Bệnh viện Thống Nhất năm 2016. Tạp chí Y học TP Hồ Chí Minh. 2016;6:28-35.
7. Ong ME, Shin SD, De Souza NN, et al. Outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests across 7 countries in Asia: The Pan Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS). Resuscitation. 2015;96:100-108. doi: 10.1016/ j.resuscitation.2015.07.026
8. Nguyễn Viết Hậu, Tăng Tuấn Phong, Nguyễn Quốc Huy, Nguyễn Khánh Dương, và cộng sự. Đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng, nguyên nhân và kết cục của người bệnh ngưng tim ngoại viện tại Khoa Cấp cứu Bệnh viện Đại học Y Dược TP Hồ Chí Minh. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2024; 544(3). doi:10.51298/vmj. v544i3.12052