COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND, CYTOLOGY, AND HISTOPATHOLOGY RESULTS IN THYROID NODULES POST-SURGERY AT CHO RAY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Thyroid nodules are a common endocrine disorder, yet only 5-10% are malignant. The primary clinical challenge is to determine the malignancy risk of these nodules to select appropriate candidates for surgery. Ultrasound (US) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) are two crucial diagnostic tools, but data simultaneously comparing both methods against the gold standard, histopathology, in post-operative patients remain limited. This study was conducted to compare the results of US, cytology, and histopathology to evaluate their diagnostic values. Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of US, cytology, and their combination for thyroid cancer in patients with thyroid nodules who underwent surgery at Cho Ray Hospital. Method: A retrospective, cross-sectional, analytical study was conducted on 248 patients with thyroid nodules who underwent surgery at Cho Ray Hospital from January 2024 to August 2024 and had complete US, cytology, and histopathology results. Result: The malignancy rate on histopathology was 74,2%, predominantly papillary thyroid carcinoma (71,8%). US features associated with malignancy included hypoechogenicity, microcalcifications, taller-than-wide shape, solid composition, and TIRADS 4-5 classification. The diagnostic value of US showed a sensitivity (Se) of 88,0%, specificity (Sp) of 68,8%, and accuracy (Acc) of 83,1%. Cytology (excluding indeterminate cases) demonstrated superior performance with Se 97,9%, Sp 97,0%, and Acc 97,7%. Combining US and cytology using the OR principle (excluding indeterminate cases) increased Se to 99,3% and Acc to 96,6%. Using the AND principle, Sp reached 97,0% and positive predictive value (PPV) was 99,2%. Conclusion: The study revealed a high rate of malignancy in the surgical cohort of thyroid nodules. Cytology has a higher diagnostic value than ultrasound. The combination of US and cytology significantly improves diagnostic accuracy, aiding clinicians in screening and surgical decision-making
Article Details
Keywords
Thyroid nodule, Ultrasound, Fine-needle aspiration, Histopathology, TIRADS, Bethesda
References
2. Ringel MD, Sosa JA, Baloch Z, et al. 2025 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. Aug 2025;35(8):841-985. doi:10.1177/10507256251363120
3. Brito JP, Al Nofal A, Montori VM, Hay ID, Morris JC. The Impact of Subclinical Disease and Mechanism of Detection on the Rise in Thyroid Cancer Incidence: A Population-Based Study in Olmsted County, Minnesota During 1935 Through 2012. Thyroid. Sep 2015;25(9):999-1007. doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0594
4. Sharma C. Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid and evaluation of discordant cases. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. Sep 2015;27(3): 147-53. doi:10.1016/j.jnci.2015. 06.001
5. Hambleton C, Kandil E. Appropriate and accurate diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a review of thyroid fine-needle aspiration. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;6(6):413-22.
6. Hammad AY, Noureldine SI, Hu T, Ibrahim Y, Masoodi HM, Kandil E. A meta-analysis examining the independent association between thyroid nodule size and malignancy. Gland Surg. Jun 2016;5(3):312-7. doi:10.21037/gs.2015.11.05
7. Cotter A, Jinih M. Thyroid nodule size and risk of malignancy: a systematic review. Discov Oncol. Jul 1 2025;16(1):1188. doi:10.1007/s12672-025-02588-y
8. Tưởng Thị Hồng Hạnh, Nguyễn Huy Hoàng, Vũ Thị Hoa, et al. Giá trị của phối hợp 2 phương pháp chọc hút tế bào và siêu âm trong chẩn đoán ung thư tuyến giáp. Tạp chí y dược lâm sàng 108. 2021;16(DB4)
9. Tran TL, Le TM, Nguyen TTT, Pham MT. The value of the eu-tirads and acr-tirads in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules. Vietnamese Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 06/15 2022;(39):48-53. doi:10.55046/ vjrnm.39.201.2020
10. Osseis M, Jammal G, Kazan D, Noun R. Comparison between Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology with Histopathology in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules. J Pers Med. Jul 28 2023;13(8) doi:10.3390/jpm13081197