PREDICTIVE VALUE OF THE KHORANA SCORE FOR LOWER EXTREMITY DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS IN CANCER PATIENTS UNDERGOING CHEMOTHERAPY

Thị Thanh Bình Đào, Minh Thông Châu

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT) is a serious complication in cancer patients, increasing mortality and compromising treatment outcomes. The Khorana score, based on simple clinical factors, is recommended for risk stratification but its performance varies across populations, particularly in Asia. Currently, no data are available in Vietnam regarding the predictive value of the Khorana score in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of the Khorana score for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in Vietnamese cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study including 198 newly diagnosed cancer patients aged ≥18 years who received at least four cycles of first-line chemotherapy at Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital from August 2024 to September 2025. Patients were followed for 6 months after the first chemotherapy. Baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. Predictive performance of the score was assessed by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity, and logistic regression analysis. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 20. Results: A total of 198 cancer patients receiving chemotherapy were included, with a median age of 56 years; 61.6% were female. The incidence of LEDVT was 5.1%. The KRS yielded an AUC of 0.714 (95% CI: 0.588–0.839), with sensitivity of 20% and specificity of 92.6% at the cutoff ≥3. Independent predictors of LEDVT included age ≥60 years (OR 8.03, 95% CI 1.41–45.53), use of topoisomerase inhibitors (OR 103.23, 95% CI 6.06–1756.56), and mitotic inhibitors (OR 14.23, 95% CI 1.68–120.39). Conclusion: The Khorana score showed fair predictive ability for LEDVT in Vietnamese cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy, with high specificity but limited sensitivity, useful for excluding low-risk patients. Age ≥60 and chemotherapy regimens containing topoisomerase or cell division inhibitors were independent predictors. Larger multicenter studies are needed to refine cutoff values and adapt prognostic models for Vietnam.

Article Details

References

Khorana AA, Rubens D, Francis CW. Screening high-risk cancer patients for VTE: A prospective observational study. Thromb Res. 2014;134(6):1205-1207. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2014.09.016
2. JNCCN. Accessed September 27, 2025. https://jnccn.org/
3. Akasaka-Kihara F, Sueta D, Ishii M, et al. Validation of the Khorana Venous Thromboembolism Risk Score in Japanese Cancer Patients. JACC Asia. 2021;1(2):259-270. doi:10. 1016/j.jacasi.2021.07.006
4. Ha H, Ko YH, Kim K, et al. Application of the Khorana score for cancer-associated thrombosis prediction in patients of East Asian ethnicity undergoing ambulatory chemotherapy. Thromb J. 2023;21(1):63. doi:10.1186/s12959-023-00505-3
5. Multivariable clinical-genetic risk model for predicting venous thromboembolic events in patients with cancer | British Journal of Cancer. Accessed September 27, 2025. https:// www.nature.com/articles/s41416-018-0027-8
6. Khorana AA, Soff GA, Kakkar AK, et al. Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Ambulatory Patients with Cancer. N Engl J Med. Published online February 21, 2019. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1814630
7. Carrier M, Abou-Nassar K, Mallick R, et al. Apixaban to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(8): 711-719. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa 1814468
8. Abdel-Razeq H, Mansour A, Abdulelah H, et al. Thromboembolic events in cancer patients on active treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy: another look! Thromb J. 2018; 16(1):2. doi:10.1186/s12959-018-0161-9
9. Lyman GH, Bohlke K, Khorana AA, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update 2014. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(6):654-656. doi:10.1200/ JCO.2014.59.7351