RESULTS OF FLATFOOT TREATMENT WITH A SUBTALAR SCREW

Hoàng Vĩnh Khiêm Trương, Phước Hùng Đỗ

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Subtalar arthrodesis with a screw is a minimally invasive surgical technique that is recognized as highly effective in the treatment of flatfoot. However, there has not been a comprehensive summary or evaluation of this technique in the Vietnamese population to determine its suitability. Objective: To evaluate the results of surgical treatment for symptomatic idiopathic flatfoot using a subtalar screw at the time points of pre-surgery, 6 weeks post-surgery, and the final follow-up examination. Methods and materials: This study used a descriptive case series design,  observing 11 patients under 16 years of age with symptomatic flatfoot who had failed non-operative treatment and subsequently underwent subtalar arthrodesis surgery using a screw. Results: The mean Talo-First Metatarsal Angle on AP view (T1M) was 2.67 ± 0.400 post-surgery, compared to 32.07 ± 2.080 pre-surgery. The mean Anteroposterior Talonavicular Coverage Angle (APTN) post-surgery was 12.54 ± 0.760 compared to 23.29 ± 1.110 pre-surgery. Preoperative Talonavicular Uncoverage (TNU) was categorized as moderate and severe at 45.5% and 54.5%, respectively, while postoperative TNU was categorized as mild and normal at 36.4% and 63.6%, respectively. The Meary's Angle (MA) post-surgery was 7.7 ± 0.320 compared to 23.3 ± 1.280 pre-surgery. The Calcaneal Pitch Angle (CP) was 15.62 ± 1,020 compared to 11.32 ± 0.950 pre-surgery. The mean Lateral Talocalcaneal Angle (LTC) post-surgery was 41.27 ± 0.760, compared to 46.1 ± 6.890 pre-surgery. The mean Talar Declination Angle (TD) was 17.91 ± 0.910, compared to 30.17 ± 3,790 pre-surgery. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score post-surgery was 90.55 ± 2,54 (range 85 to 95), which was an improvement compared to the pre-surgery mean of 69.95 ± 2.210. Conclusion: Flatfoot treatment using a subtalar screw is a less invasive surgical procedure with a low risk of complications. Both clinical symptoms and anatomical structures observed on X-ray images showed significant improvement.

Article Details

References

1. Harris WH. The correlation between minor or unrecognized developmental deformities and the development of osteoarthritis of the hip. Instr Course Lect. 2009;58:257-259.
2. Rodriguez N, Choung DJ, Dobbs MB. Rigid pediatric pes planovalgus: conservative and surgical treatment options. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010; 27(1): 79-92. doi:10.1016/j.cpm.2009. 08.004
3. Chambers EFS. An operation for the correction of flexible flat feet of adolescents. West J Surg Obstet Gynecol. 1946;54:77-86.
4. Shah NS, Needleman RL, Bokhari O, Buzas D. 2013 Subtalar Arthroereisis Survey: The Current Practice Patterns of Members of the AOFAS. Foot Ankle Spec. 2015;8(3):180-185. doi:10.1177/1938640015578514
5. Brancheau SP, Walker KM, Northcutt DR. An analysis of outcomes after use of the Maxwell-Brancheau Arthroereisis implant. J Foot Ankle Surg Off Publ Am Coll Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(1):3-8. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2011.10.019
6. Megremis P, Megremis O. Arthroereisis for Symptomatic Flexible Flatfoot Deformity in Young Children: Radiological Assessment and Short-Term Follow-Up. J Foot Ankle Surg Off Publ Am Coll Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58(5):904-915. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2019.01.012
7. Indino C, Villafañe JH, D’Ambrosi R, et al. Effectiveness of subtalar arthroereisis with endorthesis for pediatric flexible flat foot: a retrospective cross-sectional study with final follow up at skeletal maturity. Foot Ankle Surg Off J Eur Soc Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;26(1):98-104. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2018.12.002
8. de Bot RTAL, Stevens J, Hermus JPS, Staal HM, van Rhijn LW, Witlox AM. Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Subtalar Kalix II Arthroereisis for a Symptomatic Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot. Foot Ankle Spec. 2021;14(1):9-18. doi:10.1177/1938640019892062