THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN RESTAGING LOW RECTAL CANCER AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY AT HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Thị Mai Trần, Tiến Lưu Đoàn, Thành Chung Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging and response assessment of low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), compared with histopathology. Subjects and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 31 patients with low rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent nCRT, followed by MRI and radical surgery at Hanoi Medical University Hospital between January 2023 and January 2025. MRI examinations were independently reviewed by two experienced radiologists blinded to pathology results. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 to calculate sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Results: The overall accuracy of MRI for T staging was 74.2%. The kappa coefficient (κ = 0.65, p < 0.001) indicated substantial agreement between MRI and histopathology. The sensitivity of MRI for detecting residual disease was 100%. For nodal assessment, the accuracy for N0 and N1 was 88.9% and 75%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) for mesorectal fascia involvement (MRF+) was 100%. According to mrTRG, the negative predictive value (NPV) for mrTRG 4–5 was 100%. Conclusion: MRI demonstrates high accuracy and reliability in restaging low rectal cancer after nCRT, particularly for T2–T3 tumors and nodal status. However, differentiating fibrosis from residual disease and accurately identifying pathological complete response (pCR) remain challenging. The incorporation of functional sequences such as DWI/ADC and standardized scoring systems (e.g., mrTRG) may further improve diagnostic performance in the future

Article Details

References

1. Global Cancer Observatory. Vietnam fact sheets [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2022 [cited 2024 Apr 10]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/ data/factsheets/populations/704-viet-nam-fact-sheets.pdf
2. Nguyễn Văn Hiếu, Phạm Công Khánh, Trần Văn Thuật, Lê Văn Quảng, Nguyễn Tiến Quyết, Nguyễn Thanh Tùng, et al. Ung thư đại trực tràng tại Việt Nam: Đặc điểm dịch tễ và thách thức trong chẩn đoán sớm. Tạp chí Y học Lâm sàng. 2021;12(3):45-52.
3. Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hess C, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(16):1926-33.
4. Hành NM, Tuệ HT, Tường PN, An HNH. Đánh giá kết quả hóa-xạ trị tiền phẫu và phẫu thuật ung thư trực tràng tiến triển tại chỗ. Tạp chí 108 - Clinical Medicine and Pharmacy. 2023;180:38-45.
5. Trương TH, Nguyễn VB, Phạm VT, Dương TL, Trần VT. Đánh giá hiệu quả hóa xạ trị đồng thời trước phẫu thuật điều trị ung thư trực tràng giai đoạn II, III. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2021;501(2):120-6.
6. Nguyễn TN, Lê QT, Nguyễn TTH. Kết quả hóa xạ trị trước mổ ung thư trực tràng thấp giai đoạn II,III tại bệnh viện Đà Nẵng. Tạp Chí Y học Việt Nam. 2023;526(1A):114-20.
7. Phạm CP. Nghiên cứu hiệu quả của hóa xạ trị tiền phẫu trong điều trị bệnh ung thư trực tràng giai đoạn xâm lấn [Luận án Tiến sỹ Y học]. Hà Nội: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2012.
8. Phạm CK, Đỗ Anh V, Nguyễn VH, Lê VQ, Nguyễn TQ. Đặc điểm hình ảnh MRI của ung thư trực tràng sau hóa xạ trị tiền phẫu. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2020;68(4):22-8.
9. Kim YW, Cha SW, Pyo J, Kim NK, Kim MJ, Park JW, et al. Factors affecting the accuracy of mesorectal extension evaluation in rectal cancer using MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44(11): 3723-32.
10. Patel UB, Brown G, Machado I, Santos-Cores J, Pericay C, Ballesteros E, et al. MRI assessment and outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(8):e486-e497.