MRI CHARACTERISTICS OF EPIDIDYMAL–TESTICULAR TUBERCULOSIS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of epididymal–testicular tuberculosis. Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive case series including all patients with histopathological, microbiological, or immunohistochemical confirmation of epididymal–testicular tuberculosis who underwent pre-treatment scrotal MRI. Results: Between [study period], 35 patients diagnosed with epididymal–testicular tuberculosis were included. The mean age was 44.2 ± 15.2 years. Only one patient (2.9%) had a history of pulmonary tuberculosis. Most cases involved isolated epididymal lesions (62.9%), followed by combined epididymal and testicular involvement (34.2%), while isolated testicular lesions were uncommon (2.9%). Epididymal lesions were most frequently observed in the head (80%) and tail (82.9%), whereas the body was less commonly affected (45.7%). The imaging appearance of epididymal lesions was diverse; nodules with central necrosis were the most common pattern (39.4%). Regarding signal characteristics, most epididymal lesions were isointense on T1-weighted images (55.9%) and hypointense on T2-weighted images (50%). Similarly, most testicular lesions were isointense on T1-weighted images (57.1%) and showed mixed signal intensity on T2-weighted images (57.1%). The majority of epididymal and testicular lesions demonstrated heterogeneous enhancement (88.2% and 97.8%, respectively). Peripheral rim enhancement with central necrosis was a common finding in both epididymal and testicular lesions (approximately 76%). Conclusion: MRI is a valuable noninvasive imaging modality for evaluating scrotal and testicular diseases. It plays an important role in the early and accurate diagnosis of epididymal–testicular tuberculosis, facilitating appropriate treatment planning for affected patients.
Article Details
Keywords
magnetic resonance imaging, tuberculosis, epididymis, testis.
References
2. Narita M, Spitters C. Chapter 25 - Tuberculosis in Travelers and Immigrants. In: Sanford CA, Pottinger PS, Jong EC, eds. The Travel and Tropical Medicine Manual (Fifth Edition). Elsevier; 2017:356-370.
3. Figueiredo AA, Lucon AM, Gomes CM, Srougi M. Urogenital tuberculosis: patient classification in seven different groups according to clinical and radiological presentation. International braz j urol: official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. Jul-Aug 2008;34(4):422-32; discussion 432. doi:10.1590/s1677-55382008000400004
4. Ramachandran A, Das CJ, Razik A. Male genital tract tuberculosis: A comprehensive review of imaging findings and differential diagnosis. Review. Abdominal radiology (New York). Apr 2021; 46(4):1677-1686. doi:10.1007/s00261-020-02811-0
5. Kulchavenya E, Kim C-S, Bulanova O, Zhukova I. Male genital tuberculosis: epidemiology and diagnostic. World journal of urology. 2012/02/01 2012;30(1):15-21. doi:10. 1007/s00345-011-0695-y
6. Naeem M, Zulfiqar M, Siddiqui MA, et al. Imaging Manifestations of Genitourinary Tuberculosis. RadioGraphics. 2021;41(4):1123-1143. doi:10.1148/rg.2021200154
7. Figueiredo AA, Lucon AM, Srougi M. Urogenital Tuberculosis. Microbiology spectrum. Jan 2017;5(1)doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0015-2016
8. Yadav S, Singh P, Hemal A, Kumar R. Genital tuberculosis: current status of diagnosis and management. Translational andrology and urology. Apr 2017;6(2):222-233. doi:10.21037/ tau.2016.12.04
9. Muttarak M, Peh WC, Lojanapiwat B, Chaiwun B. Tuberculous epididymitis and epididymo-orchitis: sonographic appearances. AJR American journal of roentgenology. Jun 2001;176(6): 1459-66. doi:10.2214/ajr.176.6. 1761459
10. Yang B, Zhou R, Wang X, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging features of epididymal and/or testicular tuberculosis: a case series. BMC medical imaging. May 12 2025;25(1):157. doi:10.1186/ s12880-025-01699-w