EVALUATION OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY USING THE SF-36 AT 108 MILITARY CENTRAL HOSPITAL

Thị Lệ Ngọc Nguyễn, Thị Ngọc Mai Trần, Thị Thuỷ Đỗ, Việt Nam Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To describe health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the SF-36 in patients with brachial plexus injury (BPI), evaluate pre–post changes after nerve transfer surgery, and identify factors associated with the magnitude of improvement. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study of 82 BPI patients treated at 108 Military Central Hospital (05/2023–12/2024). The Vietnamese SF-36 was administered preoperatively and at discharge. Paired comparisons (paired t/Wilcoxon) were performed across eight domains and three composite scores (physical, mental, overall). Factors associated with change (Δ) were examined using independent t-tests/ANOVA. Results: Males accounted for 91.5%; mean age 34.4±12.8 (17–65); complete palsy 53.7%. Preoperatively, within the physical domains, role limitations due to physical health and bodily pain were clearly lower than the other domains, whereas physical functioning and general health were mid-range. In the mental domains, role limitations due to emotional problems was lower than the others, while vitality, mental health, and social functioning were mid-to-upper range. Physical, mental, and overall scores increased significantly after surgery: 39.0→45.3 (Δ=6.3±3.6), 57.1→61.9 (Δ=4.8±3.9), and 48.1→53.6 (Δ=5.5±2.6); all p<0.001. Physical domains and most mental domains improved markedly; only role-emotional did not show a statistically significant change. Physical improvement was greater in incomplete than in complete palsy; age and sex were not significantly associated. Conclusions: Nerve transfer surgery for brachial plexus injury leads to marked improvement in HRQoL, with more pronounced gains in the physical component.

Article Details

References

Patel AA, Donegan D, Albert T. The 36-Item Short Form. JAAOS - J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(2):126.
2. Estrella EP, Castillo-Carandang NT, Cordero CP, Juban NR. Quality of life of patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Injury. 2021; 52(4): 855-861. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020. 11.074
3. Zhang D, Dyer GSM, Garg R. Delayed Referral for Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries. J Hand Surg. 2021; 46(10):929.e1-929.e7. doi:10. 1016/j.jhsa.2021.01.026
4. Kitajima I, Doi K, Hattori Y, Takka S, Estrella E. Evaluation of quality of life in brachial plexus injury patients after reconstructive surgery. Hand Surg Int J Devoted Hand Up Limb Surg Relat Res J Asia-Pac Fed Soc Surg Hand. 2006;11(3): 103-107. doi:10.1142/ S0218810406003279
5. Novak CB, Anastakis DJ, Beaton DE, Katz J. Patient-reported outcome after peripheral nerve injury. J Hand Surg. 2009;34(2):281-287. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.11.017
6. Thatte MR, Babhulkar S, Hiremath A. Brachial plexus injury in adults: Diagnosis and surgical treatment strategies. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2013;16(1):26. doi:10.4103/0972-2327.107686
7. Sakellariou VI, Badilas NK, Stavropoulos NA, et al. Treatment Options for Brachial Plexus Injuries. Int Sch Res Not. 2014;2014(1):314137. doi:10.1155/2014/314137