EVALUATION OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY USING THE SF-36 AT 108 MILITARY CENTRAL HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To describe health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the SF-36 in patients with brachial plexus injury (BPI), evaluate pre–post changes after nerve transfer surgery, and identify factors associated with the magnitude of improvement. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study of 82 BPI patients treated at 108 Military Central Hospital (05/2023–12/2024). The Vietnamese SF-36 was administered preoperatively and at discharge. Paired comparisons (paired t/Wilcoxon) were performed across eight domains and three composite scores (physical, mental, overall). Factors associated with change (Δ) were examined using independent t-tests/ANOVA. Results: Males accounted for 91.5%; mean age 34.4±12.8 (17–65); complete palsy 53.7%. Preoperatively, within the physical domains, role limitations due to physical health and bodily pain were clearly lower than the other domains, whereas physical functioning and general health were mid-range. In the mental domains, role limitations due to emotional problems was lower than the others, while vitality, mental health, and social functioning were mid-to-upper range. Physical, mental, and overall scores increased significantly after surgery: 39.0→45.3 (Δ=6.3±3.6), 57.1→61.9 (Δ=4.8±3.9), and 48.1→53.6 (Δ=5.5±2.6); all p<0.001. Physical domains and most mental domains improved markedly; only role-emotional did not show a statistically significant change. Physical improvement was greater in incomplete than in complete palsy; age and sex were not significantly associated. Conclusions: Nerve transfer surgery for brachial plexus injury leads to marked improvement in HRQoL, with more pronounced gains in the physical component.
Article Details
Keywords
brachial plexus injury; SF-36; health-related quality of life.
References
2. Estrella EP, Castillo-Carandang NT, Cordero CP, Juban NR. Quality of life of patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Injury. 2021; 52(4): 855-861. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020. 11.074
3. Zhang D, Dyer GSM, Garg R. Delayed Referral for Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries. J Hand Surg. 2021; 46(10):929.e1-929.e7. doi:10. 1016/j.jhsa.2021.01.026
4. Kitajima I, Doi K, Hattori Y, Takka S, Estrella E. Evaluation of quality of life in brachial plexus injury patients after reconstructive surgery. Hand Surg Int J Devoted Hand Up Limb Surg Relat Res J Asia-Pac Fed Soc Surg Hand. 2006;11(3): 103-107. doi:10.1142/ S0218810406003279
5. Novak CB, Anastakis DJ, Beaton DE, Katz J. Patient-reported outcome after peripheral nerve injury. J Hand Surg. 2009;34(2):281-287. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.11.017
6. Thatte MR, Babhulkar S, Hiremath A. Brachial plexus injury in adults: Diagnosis and surgical treatment strategies. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2013;16(1):26. doi:10.4103/0972-2327.107686
7. Sakellariou VI, Badilas NK, Stavropoulos NA, et al. Treatment Options for Brachial Plexus Injuries. Int Sch Res Not. 2014;2014(1):314137. doi:10.1155/2014/314137