ULTRASOUND-GUIDED MICRO-BIOPSY OF BREAST MICROCALCIFICATIONS: EFFECTIVENESS AND APPLICATIONS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for breast microcalcifications, identify factors associated with the retrieval of calcified tissue, and assess its clinical utility in breast cancer diagnosis. Subject and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 71 patients with breast microcalcifications visible on ultrasound, who underwent ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy at K Hospital, Tan Trieu campus. Clinical, imaging, and biopsy-related variables were collected. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, univariate and multivariate logistic regression to determine factors associated with successful retrieval of calcified tissue. Results: The technical success rate was 80.3%, with most lesions diagnosed as malignant (78.9%). Independent predictive factors included calcification cluster size >1 cm (OR = 4.13; 95% CI: 1.23–13.84), BI-RADS 5 classification (OR = 5.75; 95% CI: 1.28–25.76), and higher number of core samples (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.08–3.61). Most patients experienced no complications (77.4%); minor complications included bruising, mild bleeding, and transient infection, with no serious adverse events. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for breast microcalcifications is a feasible, safe, and highly diagnostic technique in clinical practice, especially suitable for facilities without stereotactic guidance systems. Selecting lesions with larger calcification clusters, higher BI-RADS categories, and obtaining more tissue samples may improve technical success rates.
Article Details
Keywords
Breast cancer, Core needle biopsy, Microcalcifications, Ultrasound guidance
References
2. Cadavid-Fernández N, Carretero-Barrio I, Moreno-Moreno E, Rodríguez-Villena A, Palacios J, Pérez-Mies B. The role of core needle biopsy in diagnostic breast pathology. Revista de Senología y Patología Mamaria. 2022;35(Suppl 1):S3–S12.
3. Chen SC, Cheung YC, Su CH, Chen MF, Hwang TL, Hsueh S. Analysis of sonographic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors of different sizes: Sonographic features of breast tumors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2004;23(2):188–193.
4. Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH, Kim SM, Kim SJ, Lee SH, et al. Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: Comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Korean Journal of Radiology. 2005;6(2):102–109.
5. Fejzic H, Izic B, Konrad-Custovic M. Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of suspected microcalcifications in the breast. Materia Socio-Medica. 2022;34(1):66–69.
6. Nguyen SM, Nguyen QT, Nguyen LM, Pham AT, Luu HN, Tran HTT, et al. Delay in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in Vietnam. Cancer Medicine. 2021;10(21):7683–7691.
7. Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 5th ed. American College of Radiology; 2013:1–126.
8. Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology. 2003;180(4):941–948.