THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SIZE AND METASTASIS STATUS OF LYMPH NODE IN COLONIC CANCER
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the lymph node examines, lymph node metastasis (focus on the lymph nodes size : <5mm; 5 - < 10mm; 10 - < 20 mm and > 20 mm) ratio, and CEA status. Evaluated the relationship between patient’s, charateristics, CEA(+), lymph node size and lymph node metastasis status. Patient and methods: Prospective reseach of 63 cases colonic cancer, radically operated at Binh Dân Hospital from 12/2022 to 7/2023. The specimen were washed up. The tumor’s chareteristics (location, size, macro, micro, deep invasion, defferentiation chareteristics), CEA(+) were defined. The lymph node examines ratio and the lymph node metastasis ratio was determined. The relationship between the patient’s, chareteristics, CEA(+), lymph nodes size and the lymph node metastasis status were evaluated. Result: The most common age was > 40 (93,6%), ratio of male to female was 1,92. The disease is advanced at hospitalization; the tumor’s height of 2 cm or more was in 90%; tumor’s perimeter > 1/4 colonic wall’s perimeter was in 91,2%; deep invasion T3 and more was 96,8%; the buds (macro type) was 63,5%; adenocarcinoma (micro type) was 83,1% and moderately defferented was 77,8%. The lymph node examines was 23,8/ patient, the lymph node metastasis ratio was 7,2%, and the ratio and the average lymph node metastasis ratio was 1,7 per patient, the CEA(+) was 34,9%. The lymph node metastasis status were related to lymph node size: Thelarger the lymph node, the higher the rate of lympho node metastasis. Lymph node < 5mm have a significant rate of lymph node metastasis.
Article Details
Keywords
Lymph nodes size, CEA, Lymph node metastasis
References
2. Nguyễn Quang Thái (2002). Nghiên cứu một số phương pháp chẩn đoán và kết quả sau 5 năm điều trị phẫu thuật ung thư đại tràng. Luận án tiến sĩ, Đại học Y Hà Nội; tr. 1 - 148.
3. Nguyễn Triệu Vũ (2010). Nghiên cứu di căn hạch trong ung thư đại - trnc tràng, Luận văn thạc sĩ y học, Đại học Y Dược TP. Hồ Chí Minh; tr. 3 - 60.
4. Deliiski T.A (2004). Clearing technique to increase detectability of lymph nodes in radical surgery for colon and rectal cancer, Annual Proceedings IMAB (10); pp. 45 - 46.
5. NCCN Guideline Version 2.2020 (2020). Colon cancer, National Comprehensive Cancer Network ; pp. 6 - 93.
6. Miguel AR, Sherif M, Thomas KW et al (1996). Clinical significance of colorectal cancer metastases in lymph nodes < 5 mm in size, Ann Surgi Oncol, 3(2), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; pp. 124 - 130.
7. Russell H., Kathryn T., et al (2023). Correlation between lymph node size on pathology and metastasis disease in colorectal cancer. http:// pubmed. ncbi. nlm.nih. gov/ 36566668.
8. Sarli L, Bader G, Luscodi et al (2005). Number of lymph nodes examines and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer, Eu J Cancer (47); pp. 272 - 279.
9. Xiao Quang N., Jiaquing C. (2023). Predicting lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer patient. Surg 2024 Aug; 76 (4); pp 1301 - 1310.
10. Washington MK, Berlin J, Branton, et al (2009). Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with primary carcinoma of the colon and rectum, Arch Pathol Lab Med (133); pp. 1539 - 1551.