CLINICAL, LABORATORY, AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING CHARACTERISTICS OF TUBERCULOUS AND PYOGENIC SPONDYLODISCITIS

Bảo Lệ Lê 1,, Huỳnh Tường Vy Phạm 1, Thanh Ngọc Cao 1,2, Đăng Khoa Bùi 1, Đông Lập Nguyễn 1, Ngọc Tú Hồ 1, Đoàn Duy Quang Nguyễn 1
1 University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City
2 School of Medicine - University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Spondylodiscitis is an uncommon infectious disease that can lead to severe complications if diagnosis and treatment are delayed. Differentiating between tuberculous and pyogenic etiologies remains challenging due to overlapping clinical and imaging features. Objective: To compare the clinical presentation, biochemical markers, and computed tomography (CT) findings between patients with tuberculous and pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Methods: This observational study, combining retrospective and prospective data, included 73 patients diagnosed with spondylodiscitis at the University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City between August 2023 and August 2025. Among them, 24 cases were due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and 49 were due to pyogenic bacteria. Clinical features, biochemical parameters, and CT characteristics were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: Clinical manifestations were similar between tuberculous and pyogenic spondylodiscitis, including weakness (12.5% vs. 12.2%), paresthesia (25.0% vs. 32.7%), fever (37.72°C vs. 37.73°C), and urinary retention (0.0% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.088). In the pyogenic group, CRP (132.68 vs. 80.94 mg/L; p = 0.035), procalcitonin (0.54 vs. 0.14 ng/mL; p = 0.031), and HbA1C (7.64% vs. 5.91%; p = 0.036) were significantly higher, whereas IGRA positivity was more frequent in the tuberculous group (53.8% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.001). CT findings such as bone destruction and paraspinal abscesses were common in both groups without significant differences. Conclusion: Clinical and CT features of tuberculous and pyogenic spondylodiscitis show substantial overlap, reflecting disease severity rather than etiology. In contrast, biochemical markers—particularly CRP, procalcitonin, and IGRA—provide greater discriminatory value. Combining laboratory and imaging assessments can enhance diagnostic accuracy and guide appropriate management. Keywords: Spondylodiscitis; spinal tuberculosis; pyogenic spondylitis; computed tomography; CRP; procalcitonin; IGRA.

Article Details

References

1. Issa K, Diebo BG, Faloon M, Naziri Q, Pourtaheri S, Paulino CB, Emami A: The epidemiology of vertebral osteomyelitis in the United States from 1998 to 2013. Clinical Spine Surgery 2018, 31(2):E102-E108.
2. Liu YX, Lei F, Zheng LP, Yuan H, Zhou QZ, Feng DX: A diagnostic model for differentiating tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis: a retrospective case–control study. Scientific Reports 2023, 13(1):10337.
3. Gouliouris T, Aliyu SH, Brown NM: Spondylodiscitis: update on diagnosis and management. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2010, 65(suppl_3):iii11-iii24.
4. Nazirov P, Fakhridinova A, Makhmudova Z, Djuraev B: Differentiated approach to the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculous spondylitis in adults. Acta Medica Iranica 2021:191-196.
5. Rivas-Garcia A, Sarria-Estrada S, Torrents-Odin C, Casas-Gomila L, Franquet E: Imaging findings of Pott’s disease. European Spine Journal 2013, 22(Suppl 4):567-578.
6. Ansari S, Amanullah MF, Ahmad K, Rauniyar RK: Pott's spine: diagnostic imaging modalities and technology advancements. North American journal of medical sciences 2013, 5(7):404.
7. Liu X, Zheng M, Sun J, Cui X: A diagnostic model for differentiating tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis on computed tomography images. European Radiology 2021, 31(10):7626-7636.