DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF ACR O-RADS MRI v.2024 IN DIFFERENTIATING BENIGN AND MALIGNANT ADNEXAL MASSES

Thị Nhân Nguyễn, Thanh Hải Nguyễn, Thị Kim Khuyên Hoàng, Hồng Chiến Lê, Quang Nam Nguyễn, Ngọc Chiến Nguyễn, Thị Xuyến Nguyễn, Ngọc Mây Lê

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for MRI (O-RADS MRI, version 2024) developed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) provides a standardized framework for risk stratification of adnexal masses. While validated internationally, its application in Vietnam remains limited. Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between O-RADS MRI categories and histopathological outcomes of ovarian tumors, and to identify MRI features predictive of malignancy. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 63 ovarian lesions from 57 patients who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI with histopathological confirmation between January 2023 and July 2025. Results: Eighteen of 63 lesions (28.6%) were malignant, including invasive ovarian carcinoma (n=11), ovarian metastasis from gastric carcinoma (n=1) and borderline tumors (n=6). The presence of  strongly enhancing solid tissue was the strongest predictor of malignancy (OR = 35.6; 95% CI: 4.15–304.7; p=0.001). An O-RADS MRI cutoff of ≥4 achieved a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 93%, with an AUC of 0.884. Malignancy rates increased across O-RADS categories: 2 (0%), 3 (14.3%), 4 (75%), and 5 (80%). Conclusion: O-RADS MRI demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses. The assessment of enhancing solid tissue is particularly valuable for predicting malignancy and guiding management.

Article Details

References

Dabi Y, Rockall A, Sadowski E, Touboul C, Razakamanantsoa L, Thomassin-Naggara I, et al. O-RADS MRI to classify adnexal tumors: from clinical problem to daily use. Insights Imaging. 2024 Jan 30;15(1):29.
2. Sadowski EA, Thomassin-Naggara I, Rockall A, Maturen KE, Forstner R, Jha P, et al. O-RADS MRI Risk Stratification System: Guide for Assessing Adnexal Lesions from the ACR O-RADS Committee. Radiology. 2022 Apr;303(1):35–47.
3. Andreotti RF, Timmerman D, Strachowski LM, Froyman W, Benacerraf BR, Bennett GL, et al. O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee. Radiology. 2020 Jan;294(1): 168–85.
4. American College of Radiology. O-RADSTM MRI Risk Stratification and Management System. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology; https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/O-RADS/MRI
5. Sadowski EA, Stein EB, Thomassin-Naggara I, Rockall A, Nougaret S, Reinhold C, et al. O-RADS MRI After Initial Ultrasound for Adnexal Lesions: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Jan;220(1):6–15.
6. Mitchell S, Gleeson J, Tiwari M, Bailey F, Gaughran J, Mehra G, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumours: data from a London tertiary centre. BJC Rep. 2024 July 2;2(1):50.
7. Kılıçkap G. Diagnostic performance of the O-RADS MRI system for magnetic resonance imaging in discriminating benign and malignant adnexal lesions: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2024 July 8; https://dirjournal.org/articles/ doi/dir.2024.242784
8. Thomassin-Naggara I, Belghitti M, Milon A, Abdel Wahab C, Sadowski E, Rockall AG, et al. O-RADS MRI score: analysis of misclassified cases in a prospective multicentric European cohort. Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec;31(12):9588–99.
9. Thomassin-Naggara I, Poncelet E, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Guerra A, Fournier LS, Stojanovic S, et al. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 24;3(1):e1919896.