ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ANESTHESIOLOGY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND POTENTIAL FOR INTEGRATION IN VIETNAM BY 2030
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in anesthesiology, with applications ranging from preoperative risk prediction to intraoperative monitoring and postoperative management. However, its clinical integration remains limited. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of eight published articles (2022–2025) and one bibliometric analysis that explored AI applications in anesthesiology. Studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and narrative reviews that reported on AI-based decision support, drug delivery, airway assessment, or perioperative risk prediction. Results: AI demonstrated significant promise in airway risk stratification (AUC > 0.9), real-time hypotension prediction, and closed-loop anesthesia systems. RCTs included in a meta-analysis (n = 568) showed no statistically significant difference in hypotension-related outcomes (MD = 0.22, 95% CI: –0.03 to 0.48, P = 0.215; I² = 93.8%), but AI-assisted systems reduced intraoperative hypotension duration (MD = 7.41%, 95% CI: 4.95–9.86, P < 0.001). Key limitations include algorithm transparency, data heterogeneity, ethical concerns, and limited interpretability. Conclusion: Although AI offers substantial benefits in anesthesia management, its integration in clinical practice remains in early stages. Vietnam should prioritize the development of localized data-driven models, promote AI literacy in anesthesiology training, and establish national guidelines for ethical AI use.
Article Details
Keywords
Artificial intelligence, Anesthesia, Machine learning, Decision support, Risk prediction, Closed-loop
References
2. Shimada K, Inokuchi R, Ohigashi T, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted interventions for perioperative anesthetic management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. Sep 4 2024;24(1):306. doi:10.1186/ s12871-024-02699-z
3. Wilk M, Pikiewicz W, Florczak K, Jakobczak D. Use of Artificial Intelligence in Difficult Airway Assessment: The Current State of Knowledge. J Clin Med. Feb 27 2025;14(5)doi:10.3390/ jcm14051602
4. Singh M, Nath G. Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: A narrative review. Saudi J Anaesth. Jan-Mar 2022;16(1):86-93. doi:10.4103/sja. sja_669_21
5. Bogoń A, Górska M, Ostojska M, Kałuża I, Dziuba G, Dobosz M. Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology – a review. journal article. Journal of Pre-Clinical and Clinical Research. 2024; 18(3):265-269. doi:10.26444/jpccr/191550
6. Zhang Z, Duan Y, Lin J, Luo W, Lin L, Gao Z. Artificial intelligence in anesthesia: insights from the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics. Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science. 2025/02/10 2025; 3(1):5. doi:10.1007/s44254-025-00086-6
7. Singhal M, Gupta L, Hirani K. A Comprehensive Analysis and Review of Artificial Intelligence in Anaesthesia. Cureus. Sep 2023;15(9):e45038. doi:10.7759/cureus.45038
8. Malviya Amit Kumar, Khanna Puneet. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in anesthesia: applications and ethics considerations. National Board of Examinations Journal of Medical sciences. 2024;2(Special Issue):S52-S59. doi:https://doi.org/10.61770/ NBEJMS.2024.v02.i11.S07