FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SHOULDER FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR AT DA NANG HOSPITAL

Văn Thởi Đặng, Hạnh Ngô

Main Article Content

Abstract

The double-row suture-bridge technique yields favorable outcomes in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears; however, postoperative shoulder function may still be influenced by preoperative tear characteristics. Objective: To analyze the association between tendon retraction and postoperative shoulder function, and to evaluate the effects of tear size and tear pattern on treatment outcomes. Materials and Methods: We conducted a longitudinal, non-controlled study with both retrospective and prospective components in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears undergoing arthroscopic repair at Da Nang Hospital from October 2022 to July 2024. Results: Retraction grades I and II were most common (46.2% each), whereas grade III retraction was uncommon (7.6%). Medium-sized tears (1–3 cm) accounted for the largest proportion (48.7%), while massive tears (>5 cm) were least frequent (12.8%). Crescent-shaped (C-shaped) tears were the most prevalent pattern (59.0%), approximately 4–5 times more common than other patterns. At 3 months postoperatively, shoulder function differed significantly according to tendon retraction grade (p = 0.001) and tear pattern (p = 0.03). No significant association was observed between tear size and postoperative recovery. Conclusion: Tendon retraction and tear pattern were associated with shoulder function at 3 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the double-row suture-bridge technique.

Article Details

References

1. Burkhart, S. S., Danaceau, S. M., & Pearce, C. E. (2001). Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy, 17(9), 905–914.
2. Denard, P. J., & Burkhart, S. S. (2013). The evolution of suture anchor fixation. Arthroscopy, 29(9), 1589–1595.
3. Cho, N. S., et al. (2011). Suture bridge technique in rotator cuff repair. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(10), 2108–2116.
4. Park, J. Y., et al. (2008). Comparison of clinical outcomes of single- and double-row repairs. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 36(7), 1310–1316.
5. Haque, A., & Pal Singh, H. (2018). Structural integrity after rotator cuff repair. Shoulder & Elbow, 10(3), 163–169.
6. Ren, Y. M., et al. (2019). Suture-bridge versus double-row technique. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14, 36.
7. Hoàng, M. T. et al. (2022). Kết quả phẫu thuật khâu chóp xoay hai hàng. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học, 149(1), 117–125.
8. Nguyễn, M. T. et al. (2023). Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật khâu bắc cầu. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 525(1A), 181–184.