SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF RUPTURED POSTERIOR FOSSA ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS AT BACH MAI HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics, radiological features, and evaluate the surgical treatment outcomes of ruptured posterior fossa arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) at Bach Mai Hospital. Methods: This retrospective descriptive study included 63 patients diagnosed with ruptured posterior fossa AVMs who underwent surgery in the Department of Neurosurgery at Bach Mai Hospital from January 2020 to June 2025. Results: The mean age was 35.97 ± 12.6 years, with 29 males and 34 females. Most patients were admitted with acute cerebellar hemorrhage, presenting with headache (79.3%), dizziness (42.9%), and altered consciousness (28.6%); seizures were rare (3.2%). Intraventricular hemorrhage occurred in 51% of cases, causing acute hydrocephalus in 22%. Regarding AVM characteristics, 90.5% were smaller than 3 cm in size; the main feeding artery was the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (68.3%). Deep venous drainage was present in 55.6% of cases, and 41.3% had associated aneurysms. Preoperative embolization was performed in 20 of 63 cases (31.7%). Microsurgical resection of the AVM was performed in 57 patients, achieving a complete resection rate of 93%. Postoperatively, 28 of 63 patients (44.4%) experienced at least one complication. At 3-month follow-up, 47 of 63 patients (74.6%) had a good recovery (modified Rankin Scale 0–2), 8 patients (12.7%) had moderate deficits, and 8 (12.7%) had severe deficits or died. Conclusion: Ruptured posterior fossa AVMs present an acute, life-threatening condition. Surgical treatment is effective. A multimodal treatment approach tailored to the clinical and radiological features of each case yields good outcomes.
Article Details
Keywords
posterior fossa AVM; cerebellar hemorrhage; microsurgery; embolization.
References
2. Robert T, Blanc R, Ciccio G, Gilboa B, Fahed R, Boissonnet H, Redjem H, Pistocchi S, Bartolini B, Piotin M. Endovascular treatment of posterior fossa arteriovenous malformations. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;25:65–68.
3. Tong X, Wu J, Lin F, et al. Cerebellar arteriovenous malformations: Clinical feature, risk of hemorrhage and predictors of posthemorrhage outcome. World Neurosurg. 2016;92:206–217.
4. Miron I, Prună VM, Visarion D, et al. Clinical outcomes of posterior fossa arteriovenous malformations: a single center experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024;166(1):215
5. Khổng Ngọc Minh. Đặc điểm lâm sàng, chẩn đoán hình ảnh, kết quả điều trị phẫu thuật dị dạng động tĩnh mạch não hố sau tại Bệnh viện Bạch Mai. Luận văn Bác sĩ nội trú, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2021
6. Davison M, McCune M, Thiyagarajah N, Kashkoush A, Achey R, Shost M, Toth G, Bain M, Moore N. The incidence of infratentorial arteriovenous malformation - associated aneurysms: an institutional case series and systematic literature review. J Neurointerv Surg. 2025;17(7):711–716
7. Rodríguez-Hernández A, Kim H, Pourmohamad T, Young WL, Lawton MT. Cerebellar arteriovenous malformations: anatomic subtypes, surgical results, and increased predictive accuracy of the supplementary grading system. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(6):1111–1124.
8. Sinclair J, Kelly ME, Steinberg GK. Surgical management of posterior fossa arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(4 Suppl 2):ONS-189–201.
9. Drake CG, Friedman AH, Peerless SJ. Posterior fossa arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1986. 64: 1-10