INFLUENCE OF VERTICAL JAW AND CRANIOFACIAL FACTORS ON THE CLASS II FIRST MOLAR RELATIONSHIP: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY FROM THE PRIMARY TO THE PERMANENT DENTITION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: According to Angle’s classification, the first permanent molar relationship is divided into three classes, in which Class I is considered normal and Classes II and III are malocclusions. Class II malocclusion has a high prevalence and is associated with dental, arch, jaw, craniofacial, and growth-related factors. Previous studies have indicated that Class II is not only an anteroposterior discrepancy but also involves vertical skeletal and craniofacial characteristics. However, longitudinal evidence on the role of these vertical factors in the development of a Class II first molar (R6) relationship in the permanent dentition is limited, and no such study has been conducted on Vietnamese subjects. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of vertical jaw and craniofacial dimensions on the development of Class II R6 relationship from the primary to the permanent dentition. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal sample of 25 children (50 dental segments) was followed from primary dentition (T1) through mixed dentition (T2) to permanent dentition (T3). Each child had three pairs of dental casts and three corresponding lateral cephalograms at T1, T2, and T3. Twenty variables were assessed, including total anterior facial height (CCM), middle facial height (TMG), lower facial height (TMD), and the ratio of middle to lower facial height (TMG/TMD) at T1, T2, and T3, as well as the growth of these parameters from T1–T2 and T2–T3. The influence of these factors on the establishment of a Class II R6 relationship in the permanent dentition was analyzed by comparison with subjects presenting a Class I R6 relationship. Results: Compared with the Class I group, subjects with Class II malocclusion showed greater middle facial height and smaller lower facial height, resulting in a higher TMG/TMD ratio at T2 and T3. The increase in TMG/TMD from T2 to T3 was also greater in the Class II group than in the Class I group. Discussion: The findings indicate that disproportionate vertical facial growth, characterized by increased middle facial height and reduced lower facial height, is associated with the development of a Class II first molar relationship. The progressively higher middle-to-lower facial height ratio from mixed to permanent dentition in Class II subjects suggests that vertical growth pattern may contribute to the establishment and maintenance of Class II malocclusion and should be considered in diagnosis and treatment planning.
Article Details
Keywords
Class II malocclusion, facial height, middle facial height, lower facial height.
References
2. McNamara JAJ. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod. Jul 1981;51(3):177-202. doi:10.1043/ 0003-3219(1981)051<0177:Cocimi>2.0.Co;2
3. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JAJ, Tollaro I. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. May 1997;111(5):502-9. doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70287-7
4. Mouakeh M. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. Jun 2001; 119(6):640-9. doi:10.1067/mod.2001. 112671
5. Riesmeijer AM, Prahl-Andersen B, Mascarenhas AK, Joo BH, Vig KW. A comparison of craniofacial Class I and Class II growth patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. Apr 2004;125(4):463-71. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo. 2003.05.012
6. Chung CH, Wong WW. Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class II subjects: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. Dec 2002; 122(6): 619-26. doi:10.1067/mod.2002. 129195
7. Ngan P, Byczek E. Longitudinal evaluation of Class II division 1 subjects. Sem Orthod 1997;3:221-31.
8. Al-Khateeb E.A.A. Anteroposterior and Vertical Components of Class II division 1 and division 2 Malocclusion Angle Orthod. 2009;79(5):859-66.
9. Sayin MO, Türkkahraman H. Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod. Jul 2005;75(4):656-60. doi:10.1043/ 0003-3219(2005)75[656:Ceonfw]2.0.Co;2
10. Plaza SP, Reimpell A, Silva J, Montoya D. Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern. Dental Press J Orthod. Sep 5 2019;24(4):63-72. doi:10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.063-072.oar