APPLICATION OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN ASSESSING ANATOMICAL VARIANTS OF THE MAXILLARY SINUS IN CHRONIC SINUSITIS PATIENTS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic sinusitis is a common medical condition in Vietnam, affecting individuals of all ages. Multiple factors can impact the drainage pathways of the mucociliary system, leading to obstruction of the osteomeatal complex and causing chronic sinusitis. Among these factors, anatomical variations in the nasal and sinus region play a significant role, with the maxillary sinus—the largest sinus—exhibiting various anatomical variations. Objective: To investigate the anatomical variations of the maxillary sinus in patients with chronic sinusitis. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on a series of 248 patients diagnosed with chronic sinusitis based on clinical and radiological criteria at the University Medical Center, Ho Chi Minh City, from 2019 to 2023. Results: The prevalence of anatomical variations in the maxillary sinus region included Haller cells (50%), pneumatization into the roots of teeth (51.2%), maxillary sinus septa (25%), maxillary sinus hypoplasia (3.2%), ethmomaxillary sinus (13.4%), and accessory maxillary ostium (30.2%). There is a statistically significant correlation between anatomical variations (Haller cells, maxillary sinus septum, maxillary sinus hypoplasia, accessory maxillary ostium) and the sinusitis severity score; however, all correlations are weak. Conclusion: Computed tomography is an effective method for evaluating anatomical variations of the maxillary sinus region. The prevalence of anatomical variations differs among individuals, and there is no statistically significant correlation between anatomical variations and the severity of chronic sinusitis
Article Details
Keywords
Anatomical variations, maxillary, chronic sinusitis.
References
2. Ngô Văn Công. CT mũi xoang và họa đồ xoang. Nhà xuất bản Y học; 2021. 1–62 p.
3. Wu X, Cai Q, Huang D, Xiong P, Shi L. Cone-beam computed tomography-based analysis of maxillary sinus pneumatization extended into the alveolar process in different age groups. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sept 11;22(1):393.
4. Ozcan KM, Hizli O, Sarisoy ZA, Ulusoy H, Yildirim G. Coexistence of frontal sinus hypoplasia with maxillary sinus hypoplasia: a radiological study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):931–5.
5. Şirikçi A, Bayazıt YA, Bayram M, Kanlıkama M. Ethmomaxillary sinus: a particular anatomic variation of the paranasal sinuses. Eur Radiol. 2004 Feb 1;14(2):281–5.
6. Bani-Ata M, Aleshawi A, Khatatbeh A, Al-Domaidat D, Alnussair B, Al-Shawaqfeh R, et al. Accessory Maxillary Ostia: Prevalence of an Anatomical Variant and Association with Chronic Sinusitis. Int J Gen Med. 2020;13:163–8.
7. Önder Turna MDA. Anatomic Variations of the Paranasal Sinus Region: Evaluation with Multidetector CT. 2014;
8. Selcuk A, Ozcan KM, Akdogan O, Bilal N, Dere H. Variations of maxillary sinus and accompanying anatomical and pathological structures. J Craniofac Surg. 2008 Jan;19(1):159–64.
9. Amine K, Slaoui S, Kanice FZ, Kissa J. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomical variations and lesions: A retrospective analysis using cone beam computed tomography. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Nov;121(5):484–9.
10. Mai Thế Cảnh. Cắt lớp vi tính đa dãy trong đánh giá biến thể giải phẫu mũi xoang trong bệnh lý viêm xoang mạn tính sử dụng đánh giá C.L.O.S.E. Luận văn Bác sĩ Chuyên khoa II, Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2022.