RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PREVENTIVE AND TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH EARLY AMPUTATION ULCERS AT THE STROKE DEPARTMENT - 103MILITARY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Evaluation of the Preventive and Therapeutic Effectiveness of Sanyrène Spray in Early-Stage Sacral Pressure Injuries and the Association Between Treatment Outcomes and Selected Clinical and Paraclinical Characteristics in Patients at the Stroke Department, 103 Military Hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive and interventional clinical study with a before-and-after comparison was conducted in stroke inpatients at the Stroke Department – 103 Military Hospital. Patients at high risk of developing pressure ulcers or presenting with early-stage pressure ulcers were treated with Sanyrene spray. The efficacy of ulcer healing was evaluated at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of treatment, and the time to complete ulcer healing was assessed. Results: The mean age of the study population was 67.3 ± 16.1 years, with the majority of patients aged over 70 years (49.2%). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding age and gender. Most participants were retired officers, accounting for more than 45%. The proportion of patients achieving wound healing within <5 days was 50% in the Sanyrene-treated group, compared to 36.7% in the control group. A statistically significant association was observed between the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and Body Mass Index (BMI) with the time to pressure ulcer healing (p < 0.05). Patients with lower GCS and BMI values exhibited a longer healing duration. Conclusion: The Sanyrène spray demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of early-stage sacral pressure ulcers, contributing to shorter wound-healing time, reduced ulcer progression, and improved skin condition in pressure-bearing areas. The proportion of patients achieving wound closure within 5 days reached 50% in the Sanyrène-treated group, compared to 36.7% in the control group. Patients with lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (5–8 points) or lower Body Mass Index (BMI < 18.5) experienced delayed wound healing, whereas those with normal BMI and better consciousness levels showed faster recovery.
Article Details
Keywords
Pressure ulcers, Sanyrene
References
2. Trần Đức Minh, Vũ Văn Khâm, & Quàng Thị Ngân. (2024). Thực trạng loét tỳ đè của người bệnh tại Đơn vị Hồi sức Ngoại Bệnh viện Bạch Mai năm 2024 và một số yếu tố liên quan. Tạp chí Y học Cộng đồng, 65(5).
3. Abouelenin, M., Mahmoud, M., & El-Sayed, M. (2023). Prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in intensive care units of the Eastern Mediterranean region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 175.
4. Alvarez, O. M., Kalinski, C., Nusbaum, J., Hernandez, L., Pappous, E. P., Parker, R., … & Seaman, S. (1995). The usefulness of topical application of essential fatty acids (EFA) to prevent pressure ulcers. Advances in Wound Care, 8(6), 40–51.
5. Beeckman, D., Schoonhoven, L., Fletcher, J., Furtado, K., Gunningberg, L., Heyman, H.,… & Vanderwee, K. (2009). Efficacy of a topical Corpitolinol 60-based agent (Sanyrène) for preventing pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients: A multicenter observational study. Journal of Wound Care, 18(10), 456–462.
6. Ghaffari, F., Ghafarian Shirazi, H. R., & Ranjbar, H. (2019). Incidence of pressure ulcers in intensive care units and direct costs of treatment: Evidence from Iran. Nursing Open, 6(2), 608–614.
7. Labeau, S. O., Afonso, E., Benbenishty, J., Blackwood, B., Boulanger, C., Brett, S. J.,… & The DecubICUs Study Group. (2020). Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: The DecubICUs study. Intensive Care Medicine, 46(10), 1909–1919.
8. Meaume, S., Colin, D., Barrois, B., Bohbot, S., & Allaert, F. A. (2005). Preventing the occurrence of pressure ulceration in hospitalised elderly patients. Journal of Wound Care, 14(2), 78–82.
9. Saghaleini, S. H., Dehghan, K., Shadvar, K., Sanaie, S., Mahmoodpoor, A., & Ostadi, Z. (2018). Pressure ulcer and nutrition. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 22(4), 283–289.