VALUE OF DIAGNOSTIC MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN ASSESSING MUSCLE INVASION IN PATIENTS WITH BLADDER CANCER
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the imaging characteristics of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bladder cancer. Subjects and Methods: A prospective descriptive study was conducted on 39 patients with suspected bladder cancer who underwent mpMRI and surgical pathological examination at the 108 Military Central Hospital from September 2024 to July 2025. Imaging features of bladder cancer were assessed on mpMRI, including T2-weighted imaging (T2W), diffusion-weighted imaging/apparent diffusion coefficient (DWI/ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequences. The imaging findings were compared with postoperative histopathology. Results: A total of 39 patients with bladder cancer underwent multiparametric MRI. The mean age of the study population was 64.8 ± 12.3 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 4:1. Most patients were admitted with hematuria, accounting for 71.8%. The most common tumor location was the right bladder wall (38.5%), followed by the left wall (35.9%). Patients with a single tumor represented the largest proportion (69.2%), with one patient presenting with up to 10 tumors. Bladder tumors were most frequently found in the 11–30 mm size group, and the mean tumor size was 19.9 ± 13.7 mm. Papillary tumors without stalk were the most common type (63.6%). No flat lesions were identified. On T2-weighted sequences, most lesions demonstrated intermediate signal intensity (97%). On DWI, all lesions (100%) showed diffusion restriction, appearing hyperintense on DWI and hypointense on the ADC map. On T1-weighted sequences, the tumors predominantly exhibited low signal intensity (97%), with only 3% showing high signal intensity. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging showed that the majority of tumors (90.9%) enhanced early at 20 seconds, while 9.1% demonstrated delayed enhancement at 60 seconds. No tumors were non-enhancing. Conclusion: Multiparametric MRI plays an important role in the early detection and treatment planning of bladder cancer.
Article Details
Keywords
bladder cancer, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, mpMRI.
References
2. Lê Trọng Dũng, Nguyễn Văn Thi và Bùi Văn Giang (2022), "Nghiên cứu giá trị của thang điểm VI-RADS trong đánh giá ung thư bàng quang xâm lấn cơ trên cộng hưởng từ 1.5 Tesla", Tạp chí y học Việt Nam.
3. Nguyễn Quang Toàn (2018), Vai trò của cộng hưởng từ trong chẩn đoán giai đoạn T ung thư bàng quang, Luận văn Thạc sỹ Y học, Đại học Y Hà Nội.
4. Nghiêm Phương Thảo (2023), Vai trò của cộng hưởng từ trong chẩn đoán phân độ giai đoạn T ung thư bàng quang, Tạp Chí Y học Việt Nam, 526(1A). doi:10.51298/vmj.v526i1A.5332
5. Oğuz, U. và các cộng sự. (2022), "Prospective assessment of VI-RADS score in multiparametric MRI in bladder cancer: accuracy and the factors affecting the results", Diagn Interv Radiol. 28(5), tr. 396-402.
6. Sung, H. và các cộng sự. (2021), "Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries", CA Cancer J Clin. 71(3), tr. 209-249.
7. Wang, Ziyong và các cộng sự. (2020), "Evaluation of the value of the VI-RADS scoring system in assessing muscle infiltration by bladder cancer", Cancer Imaging. 20(1), tr. 26.
8. Watanabe H, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Goshima S, Tsuge Y, Onozuka M, Moriyama N. Preoperative T staging of urinary bladder cancer: does diffusion-weighted MRI have supplementary value? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 May;192(5):1361-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1430.
9. Sakamoto, Kazumasa và các cộng sự. (2020), "Detection of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer on Biparametric MRI Using Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values (VI-RADS/ADC)", Bladder Cancer. 6(2), tr. 161-169.
10. Yuan L, Li D, Mu D, Zhang X, Kong W, Cheng L, Shu X, Zhang B, Wang Z. Combined T2 SPAIR, Dynamic Enhancement and DW Imaging Reliably Detect T Staging and Grading of Bladder Cancer With 3.0T MRI. Front Oncol. 2020 Nov 10;10:582532. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.582532.