ARTHROSCOPIC REPAIR PROTOCOL FOR MASSIVE ROTATOR CUFF TEARS AUGMENTED WITH PLATELET - RICH FIBRIN

Mạnh Khánh Nguyễn , Văn Hải Đỗ , Văn Học Nguyễn , Đình Bằng Cao, Quốc Tuấn Trần, Ngọc Đình Phạm , Huy Thiệp Nguyễn , Hoàng Quân Nguyễn , Xuân Hoàng Lê

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To present the arthroscopic repair protocol for massive rotator cuff tears augmented with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), aiming to optimize the biological environment at the tendon–bone interface and enhance healing potential. Background: Massive rotator cuff tears have a high retear rate due  to poor tendon quality and limited intrinsic healing capacity at the tendon–bone junction. Autologous PRF provides a stable fibrin matrix enriched with growth factors (TGF-β1, PDGF, VEGF, FGF, IGF, EGF), promoting angiogenesis, fibroblast differentiation, and improved tendon–bone healing after repair. Methods/Technique: This article describes the step-by-step surgical workflow including autologous PRF preparation, intra-articular assessment of the tear, footprint preparation, anchor placement, PRF application at the tendon–bone interface, and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair technique. Clinical significance: PRF augmentation during repair of massive rotator cuff tears is expected to enhance the local biological microenvironment, promote early neovascularization, reduce retear rates, and improve postoperative functional outcomes compared with conventional techniques. Conclusion: Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with PRF augmentation is a feasible, safe, and biologically promising technique. The standardized protocol provided in this article facilitates practical adoption by orthopedic surgeons

Article Details

References

Trasolini, N. A. & Waterman, B. R. Editorial Commentary: Rotator Cuff Repairs Fail at an Alarmingly High Rate During Long-Term Follow-Up: Graft Augmentation and Biologics May Improve Future Outcomes. Arthroscopy 38, 2413–2416 (2022).
2. Yang, F.-A. et al. Effects of applying platelet-rich plasma during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Sci Rep 10, 17171 (2020).
3. Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix in the Management of Arthroscopic Repair of the Rotator Cuff - Stephen C. Weber, Jeffrey I. Kauffman, Carol Parise, Sophia J. Weber, Stephen D. Katz, 2013. https://journals. sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0363546512467621?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
4. Mao, X. & Zhan, Y. The efficacy and safety of platelet-rich fibrin for rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 13, 202 (2018).
5. Zumstein, M. A., Jost, B., Hempel, J., Hodler, J. & Gerber, C. The clinical and structural long-term results of open repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90, 2423–2431 (2008).
6. Kiely, L., Touyz, S., Conti, J. & Hay, P. Conceptualising specialist supportive clinical management (SSCM): current evidence and future directions. J Eat Disord 10, 32 (2022).
7. Belk, J. W. et al. Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized controlled trials. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30, 951–960 (2021).
8. Kim, Y.-S. et al. Is early passive motion exercise necessary after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? Am J Sports Med 40, 815–821 (2012).
9. Batchelder, A. J., Williams, R., Sutton, C. & Khanna, A. The evolution of minimally invasive bariatric surgery. J Surg Res 183, 559–566 (2013).
10. Kuhn, J. E., Helmer, T. T., Dunn, W. R. & Throckmorton V, T. W. Development and reliability testing of the frequency, etiology, direction, and severity (FEDS) system for classifying glenohumeral instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20, 548–556 (2011).