FRONTO-ORBITAL DISTRACTION OUTCOMES FOR UNILATERAL CORONAL SYNOSTOSIS

Hoàng Thơm Đặng, Ngọc Lâm Vũ , Thị Thiên Trang Lê , Huy Lương Dương , Anh Quân Lương

Main Article Content

Abstract

FOD is a gradual, controlled correction of fronto-orbital deformities, which provides better improvement for the craniofacial asymmetry compared to other traditional techniques. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of Fronto-Orbital Distraction (FOD) for the treatment of premature unilateral coronal synostosis in children. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted on 11 patients diagnosed with isolated unilateral coronal synostosis, corrected with fronto-orbital distraction method at the Craniofacial and Plastic Surgery Department, National Children's Hospital from 2022 to 2024. All patients underwent 3D CT scanning at 3 times: pre-surgery, distraction device removal, and 1-year visit. A single distraction device was placed horizontally across the prematurely fused suture after osteotomy at the 10 o'clock position. Distraction rotation was performed from 2 days after surgery, twice per day, at a rate of 1 mm per day. Distraction rotation was stopped when the distraction reached 30mm, and the device was removed after 3 months. Surgical outcomes, facial symmetry, orbital morphology, and cranial base were evaluated. Results: Fronto-orbital distraction with a modified osteotomy technique was performed on 11 patients with unilateral coronal synostosis. The mean age at surgery was 6.2 ± 3.1 months, 45.4% showed signs of increased intracranial pressure, the mean operative time was 119.8 ± 25.5 minutes. One-year follow-up showed superior improvement in all aspects regarding frontal disproportion, volume discrepancy, and asymmetry in the orbital, nasal, and sphenoid regions after FOD. The disparity in the fronto-orbital-nasal angle improved: reduced to 1.5 ± 1.2 degrees compared to 8.7 ± 2.1 degrees before surgery, and remained stable at 1.2 ± 0.8 degree upon device removal. During the follow-up period, all patients were satisfied with the aesthetic and functional results. No remarkable complications noted, one case of dural tear was immediately managed with suture repair. Conclusion: Fronto-orbital distraction (FOD) surgery yields good, aesthetically and functionally sustainable results, significantly improves the symmetry of the frontal, orbital, and craniofacial regions. This is a feasible, safe, effective, and minimally invasive procedure that might be preferred for the treatment of unilateral coronal synostosis. It should only be applied in craniomaxillofacial surgical centers with comprehensive expertise, excellent surgical anesthesia and resuscitation capabilities, and well-trained surgeons.

Article Details

References

1. Tarnow P, Kölby L, Maltese G, et al. Incidence of non-syndromic and syndromic craniosynostosis in Sweden. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33:1517–1520
2. Kobayashi S, Honda T, Saitoh A, Kashiwa K. Unilateral coronal synostosis treated by internal forehead distraction. J Craniofac Surg. 1999;10:467–471; discussion 472Choi JW, Ra YS, Hong SH, et al. Use of distraction osteogenesis to change endocranial morphology in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:995–1004
3. Öwall L, Darvann TA, Hove HB, et al. Facial asymmetry in nonsyndromic and Muenke syndrome-associated unicoronal synostosis: a 3-dimensional study based on facial surfaces extracted from CT scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021;58:687–696. Silveira Camargos I, Metzler P, Persing J, Alcon A, Steinbacher DM. Nasal soft-tissue and vault deviation in unicoronal synostosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68:615–621.
4. Hoppe IC, Taylor JA. A cohort study of strabismus rates following correction of the unicoronal craniosynostosis deformity: conventional bilateral fronto-orbital advancement versus fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32:2362–2365. Selber JC, Brooks C, Kurichi JE, et al. Long-term results following fronto-orbital reconstruction in nonsyndromic unicoronal synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:251e–260e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816a9f88.
5. McKee RM, Carbullido MK, Ewing E, et al. Orbital volumetric analysis in patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis: a comparison between distraction osteogenesis and fronto-orbital advancement. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;86(Suppl 3):S367–S373Taylor JA,
6. Tahiri Y, Paliga JT, Heuer GG. A new approach for the treatment of unilateral coronal synostosis based on distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:176e–178e
7. Frank N, Beinemann J, Thieringer FM, et al. The need for overcorrection: evaluation of computer-assisted, virtually planned, fronto-orbital advancement using postoperative 3D photography. Neurosurg Focus 2021;50:E5.
8. Mellgren J, Liang C, Buzi C, Profico A, Khonsari RH, Säljö K, Moazen M, Kölby Surgical Correction of Unicoronal Synostosis: Fronto-Orbital Distraction versus Calvarial Switch.L.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 Jul 1;156(1):91e-102e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011923. Epub 2024 Dec 17.PMID: 39688622
9. Long Villavisanis DF, Blum JD, Cho DY, Carlson AR, Heuer GG, Swanson JW, Bartlett SP, Taylor JA -term aesthetic and photogrammetric outcomes in non-syndromic unicoronal synostosis: comparison of fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis and fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. Childs Nerv Syst. 2023 May;39(5):1283-1296. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-05857-9. Epub 2023 Feb 4.PMID: 36738322
10. Jonas Mellgren 1 2, Ce Liang 2, Costantino Buzi 3 4, Antonio Profico 5, Roman H Khonsari 6, Karin Säljö 1, Mehran Moazen 2, Lars Kölby 1Surgical Correction of Unicoronal Synostosis: Fronto-Orbital Distraction versus Calvarial Switch Plast Reconstr Surg2025 Jul 1;156(1):91e-102e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011923
11. Fearon JA, Ruotolo RA, Kolar JC. Single sutural craniosynostoses: Surgical outcomes and long-term growth. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:635–642. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318195661a