PREVALENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS AMONG HEALTHCARE WORKERS INVOLVED IN EPIDEMIC PREVENTION AND CONTROL IN HO CHI MINH CITY

Thảo Ngân Tiêu, Quốc Hưng Ngô, Thị Phụng Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the level of psychological stress and identify factors associated with stress among healthcare workers (HCWs) involved in COVID-19 prevention and control activities in Ho Chi Minh City. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in March 2021 among 271 HCWs working in the preventive medicine sector at the Ho Chi Minh City Center for Disease Control (HCDC). The DASS-21 scale (7-item stress subscale) was used to assess stress levels. In-depth analyses were performed on 154 HCWs whose stress levels ranged from “Moderate” to “Extremely Severe.” Data were processed and analyzed using SPSS version 22.0. Results: A total of 56.8% of HCWs reported moderate to extremely severe stress. Among these, severe stress accounted for the largest proportion (59.7%), while extremely severe stress was observed in 15.6%. The most influential factor contributing to stress was work-related characteristics (Mean Score = 2.94), with the primary concern being “infecting others” (Mean Score = 3.51). Family-related factors ranked second (Mean Score = 2.70), followed by personal factors (Mean Score = 2.48) and social factors (Mean Score = 2.42). The three most significant specific stressors identified were “job position” (Mean Score = 3.53), “infecting others” (Mean Score = 3.51), and “lack of time for child care” (Mean Score = 3.42). Conclusion: The prevalence of psychological stress among preventive healthcare workers was alarmingly high (56.8%), with the majority experiencing severe levels of stress. Work-related factors (fear of infection, income instability) and family-related factors (lack of time for children) were identified as the primary sources of stress.

Article Details

References

1. Đỗ Mạnh Tôn. “Về một số biện pháp đảm bảo sức khỏe tinh thần cho người lao động hiện nay.” Hội thảo khoa học chăm sóc sức khỏe tinh thần - Hội Khoa học Tâm lý giáo dục Việt Nam, 2008, Bảo Long.
2. Bộ Y tế. “Bản tin cập nhật tình hình Covid-19 (28/4/2020).” Cục Y tế Dự phòng, 2020, http://vncdc.gov.vn/vi/phong-chong-dich-benh-viem-phoi-cap-ncov/13953/ban-tin-cap-nhat-tinh-hinh-civid-19-ngay-28-4-2020.
3. Đào Duy Duyên. “Vấn đề stress của công nhân ở một số khu chế xuất, khu công nghiệp trên địa bàn thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.” Luận văn Thạc sĩ Tâm lý học, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 2010.
4. Rossi, R., Socci, V., Pacitti, F., Di Lorenzo, G., Di Marco, A., Siracusano, A., and A. Rossi. “Mental Health Outcomes among Frontline and Second-Line Health Care Workers during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic in Italy.” JAMA Network Open, 2020.
5. Cooper, C. L., et al. “Mental Health, Job Satisfaction, and Job Stress among General Practitioners.” BMJ, 1989.
6. Đỗ Thị Lệ Hằng. Căng thẳng ở học sinh THPT. Luận án Tiến sĩ Tâm lý học, Học viện Khoa học Xã hội, 2013.
7. Aiken, L. H., et al. “Hospital Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality, Nurse Burnout, and Job Dissatisfaction.” JAMA, 2002.
8. Bùi Hồng Quân. “Từ các mô hình giảm căng thẳng trong môi trường công việc cho đội ngũ Y, Bác sĩ và NVYT ở Úc đến những đề xuất cho Việt Nam.” Hội thảo Quốc tế Tâm lý học, 2019.