FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AND TENDON HEALING FOLLOWING ARTHROSCOPIC SINGLE-ROW REPAIR OF LARGE AND MASSIVE ROTATOR CUFF TEARS

Duong Nguyen Minh 1, Bao Van Dinh Thai 2, Hung Do Phuoc2, Phu Nguyen Hoang2, Can Le Viet2, Hieu Nguyen Trung2,
1 Saigon-Ito Phu Nhuan Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
2 Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction: Large and massive rotator cuff tears frequently cause pain, functional limitation, and weakness. Single-row arthroscopic repair is widely performed due to its technical simplicity and cost-effectiveness. The study aims to evaluate functional outcomes, tendon healing, and structural changes following single-row repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients (23 men, 21 women; mean age 62 ± 7.4 years) who underwent arthroscopic single-row repair between 2021 and 2024. Preoperative assessment included tear size, tendon retraction (Patte), fatty infiltration (Goutallier), and tangent sign. Functional outcomes were measured using UCLA Shoulder Rating Scale and VAS. Postoperative tendon healing was assessed in 22 patients (50% of the cohort) via MRI. Results: Mean follow-up was 20.2 months. UCLA scores improved from 13.6 ± 2.9 to 30.3 ± 2.5, and VAS decreased from 7.4 ± 0.6 to 2.5 ± 0.9 (p < 0.001). Complete repair was achieved in 65.9% of cases; medialization (<10 mm) in 63.6%. MRI showed 38.3% intact tendons (Sugaya I–II) and 61.7% partial/full-thickness defects (Sugaya III–V). Some patients demonstrated improved tendon retraction and apparent improvement in fatty infiltration. No major complications were observed. Conclusions: Single-row arthroscopic repair significantly improves function and reduces pain in large and massive rotator cuff tears. Despite a moderate re-tear rate, tendon quality and fatty degeneration may improve, supporting single-row repair as a clinically effective option when double-row repair is not feasible.

Article Details

References

1. Burkhart SS, Lo IKY, Brady PC. Burkhart's View of the Shoulder: A Cowboy's Guide to Advanced Shoulder Arthroscopy: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
2. Lee KS, Kim DH, Chung SW, Yoon JP. Current concepts in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2025;28(1):103-12.
3. Perez Gutierrez EA, Mendoza AA, Galaviz Morales JP, Arambula Torres LE, Portillo Ortiz NK, Nafarrate EB. Comparative analysis of single-row vs. double-row technique for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and statistical analysis. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2025;5(4):857-64.
4. Rossi LA, Rodeo SA, Chahla J, Ranalletta M. Current Concepts in Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques: Biomechanical, Functional, and Structural Outcomes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7(9):2325967119868674.
5. Chen Y-S, Kuan F-C, Su W-R, Hong C-K, Chen Y, Hsu K-L. Improved clinical outcomes after arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair with rotator interval shift for the treatment of massive irreparable anterior L-shaped rotator cuff tears. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025;20(1):562.
6. Sharma DK, Sharma A, Kankane A, Kumar A, Kumar N. Clinico-Radiological Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With a Single-Row Construct Supplemented With Bone Marrow Vents. Cureus. 2025;17(12):e100261.
7. Kim E, Kopp B, Kortlever JTP, Johnson A, Ring D. Correlation of defect size with fatty infiltration on MRIs of rotator cuff tendinopathy. Journal of Orthopaedics. 2023;36:125-9.
8. Willis JT, Field LD. Rotator Cuff Footprint Medialization: Indications and Technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2025;14(1):103158.