COMPARISON OF IN VITRO FERTILIZATION CYCLE OUTCOMES AMONG DIFFERENT BMI GROUPS IN FEMALE PATIENTS AT HONG NGOC GENERAL HOSPITAL IN 2024
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Abnormal body mass index (BMI) is suggested to affect in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes, but evidence from IVF centers in Vietnam remains limited. Objectives: To compare the differences in embryo quality and clinical pregnancy outcomes among different BMI groups in female patients undergoing IVF/ICSI. Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 398 IVF/ICSI cycles from January 1 to October 31, 2024. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to WHO Asian BMI classification: underweight (<18.5 kg/m²), normal (18.5-22.9 kg/m²), overweight (23-24.9 kg/m²), and obese (≥25 kg/m²). The number of oocytes, fertilization rate, embryo quality (day-3 embryos, blastocysts), and clinical pregnancy outcomes (β-hCG+, gestational sac, fetal heart, biochemical pregnancy) were compared. Results: There were no significant differences in the number of retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, day-3 embryo rate, and blastocyst formation rate among groups (p>0.05). However, the rate of good/fair quality blastocysts in the normal BMI group (81.82%) was significantly higher than in other groups (p<0.05). The BMI ≥25 group had the highest biochemical pregnancy rate (18.4%) and a 3.28 times higher risk of biochemical pregnancy (95% CI: 1.18-8.69) compared to the normal BMI group. Conclusion: BMI did not affect ovarian response and fertilization rate in controlled IVF cycles. However, normal BMI (18.5-22.9 kg/m²) yielded better blastocyst quality. Obesity (BMI ≥25) significantly increased the risk of biochemical pregnancy, suggesting adverse effects on the endometrial environment. Patients should be counseled to achieve an ideal BMI, and a blastocyst culture strategy should be applied to optimize IVF outcomes.
Keywords
Body mass index, in vitro fertilization, embryo quality, biochemical pregnancy.
Article Details
References
2. Cai J, et al. Low body mass index is associated with ectopic pregnancy following assisted reproductive techniques: a retrospective study. Bjog. 2021;128(3):540-550.
3. Maheshwari A, et al. Effect of overweight and obesity on assisted reproductive technology--a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(5):433-44.
4. Rittenberg V, et al. Effect of body mass index on IVF treatment outcome: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23(4):421-39.
5. Shingshetty L, et al. Predictors of success after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2024;121(5):742-751.
6. Valckx SD, et al. BMI-related metabolic composition of the follicular fluid of women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment and the consequences for oocyte and embryo quality. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(12):3531-9.
7. Zander-Fox DL, et al. Does obesity really matter? The impact of BMI on embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes after IVF in women aged ≤38 years. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52(3):270-276.
8. Zhu L, et al. Association Between Body Mass Index and Female Infertility in the United States: Data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2018. Int J Gen Med. 2022;15:1821-1831.