ASSOCIATION BETWEEN IN-HOSPITAL BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY AND SHORT-TERM CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME

Nguyễn Phương Hải Trần 1,, Trần Khánh Hà Đỗ 2
1 Department of Interventional Cardiology, Cho Ray Hospital
2 Tam Tri Nha Trang Genaral Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Blood pressure variability has increasingly been recognized as an important cardiovascular risk factor; however, the prognostic role of in-hospital blood pressure variability for post-discharge outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the association between in-hospital systolic blood pressure variability, assessed by the standard deviation of systolic blood pressure (SD_SBP), and cardiovascular events within 120 days after discharge in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center study conducted in 125 hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome. Blood pressure variability was assessed using SD_SBP derived from in-hospital blood pressure measurements. The primary outcome was the occurrence of cardiovascular events within 120 days after discharge. Associated factors were analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Results: The study included 125 patients with acute coronary syndrome, with a mean age of 67.1 ± 11.4 years, and 66.4% were male. Among them, 30 patients (24.0%) were diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and 70 patients (56.0%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention during hospitalization. The incidence of major cardiovascular events within 120 days after discharge was 20.8%. The optimal cutoff value of blood pressure variability for predicting short-term post-discharge cardiovascular events was an SD_SBP of 18.47 mmHg, yielding a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 87.9%. SD_SBP was identified as an independent predictor of post-discharge cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Conclusion: Blood pressure variability assessed by the standard deviation shows moderate predictive value for the occurrence of major cardiovascular events after discharge in patients with acute coronary syndrome. In-hospital systolic blood pressure variability is an independent prognostic factor for cardiovascular events within 120 days after discharge in this patient population.

Article Details

References

1. Parati G, Bilo G, Kollias A, et al. Blood pressure variability: methodological aspects, clinical relevance and practical indications for management - a European Society of Hypertension position paper ∗. J Hypertens. 2023 Apr 1;41(4):527-544.
2. Schutte AE, Kollias A, Stergiou GS. Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2022 2022/10/01;19(10):643-654.
3. Sheikh AB, Sobotka PA, Garg I, et al. Blood Pressure Variability in Clinical Practice: Past, Present and the Future. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 2;12(9):e029297.
4. Narita K, Hoshide S, Kario K. Short- to long-term blood pressure variability: Current evidence and new evaluations. Hypertension Research. 2023 2023/04/01;46(4):950-958.
5. Hassan AKM, Abd-El Rahman H, Mohsen K, et al. Impact of in-hospital blood pressure variability on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Dec;19(12):1252-1259.
6. Weisel CL, Dyke CM, Klug MG, et al. Day-to-day blood pressure variability predicts poor outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective study. World J Cardiol. 2022 May 26;14(5):307-318.
7. Kumar R, Shah JA, Solangi BA, et al. The Burden of Short-term Major Adverse Cardiac Events and its Determinants after Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: A Prospective Follow-up Study. Journal of the Saudi Heart Association. 2022;34(2):100-109.
8. Saito K, Saito Y, Kitahara H, et al. In-Hospital Blood Pressure Variability: A Novel Prognostic Marker of Renal Function Decline and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2020;45(5):748-757.