OUTCOMES OF TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR OSTEOARTHRITIS USING A KINEMATIC KNEE PROSTHESIS AT VIET DUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical characteristics, radiographic features, and surgical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis using a kinematic knee prosthesis at Viet Duc University Hospital from June 2024 to June 2025. Subjects and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional descriptive study without a control group was conducted on 45 patients with varus deformity due to knee osteoarthritis who underwent TKA using a kinematic knee prosthesis at Viet Duc University Hospital from June 2024 to June 2025. Results: The average age of patients with varus knee osteoarthritis ranged from 60 to 69 years, with a predominance of females. The most common symptom was pain during ambulation (77.8%), and the mean range of motion was 105 ± 8.3 degrees. Clinically, varus deformity associated with flexion contracture was most common (55.8%). On radiographs, grade IV osteoarthritis accounted for 84.4%, while mild varus deformity (3°-<10°) was most frequent (55.5%), and severe deformity (≥20°) accounted for 6.7%. Postoperatively, the lower limb mechanical axis improved significantly by 9.1 ± 2.9. Clinical and functional outcomes of the knee improved significantly after surgery, with a Knee Score (KS) of 84.3 ± 3.6 and a Knee Function Score (KFS) of 85.4 ± 5.3. Conclusion: Total knee arthroplasty using a kinematic knee prosthesis achieved a neutral mechanical axis postoperatively. Knee function, pain level, and range of motion improved significantly compared to preoperative status.
Article Details
Keywords
Total knee arthroplasty; kinematic knee prosthesis.
References
2. Nisar S, Palan J, Rivière C, Emerton M, Pandit H. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5(7):380-390. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.5.200010
3. Dossett HG, Arthur JR, Makovicka JL, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Kinematically and Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasties: Long-Term Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(6S):S209-S214. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.065
4. Thienpont E, Parvizi J. A New Classification for the Varus Knee. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(10):2156-2160. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.034
5. Sharma L, Song J, Felson DT, Cahue S, Shamiyeh E, Dunlop DD. The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. JAMA. 2001;286(2):188-195. doi:10.1001/jama.286.2.188
6. Lording T, Lustig S, Neyret P. Coronal alignment after total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2016;1(1):12-17. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.1.000002
7. Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):45-53. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1936-5
8. Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN. The New Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):3-19. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2135-0
9. (PDF) The Effect of Severe Varus Deformity on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Mechanical Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with Medial Stabilizing Technique. ResearchGate. Published online October 12, 2025. doi:10.3390/jcm13061595
10. Treatment of Severe Varus Deformity in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty using Metal Augment. ResearchGate. doi:10.21608/zumj.2025.367865.3878