OUTCOMES OF TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR OSTEOARTHRITIS USING A KINEMATIC KNEE PROSTHESIS AT VIET DUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Mạnh Khánh Nguyễn, Văn Học Nguyễn, Đình Bằng Cao, Văn Hải Đỗ, Văn Long Đặng, Trung Kiên Nguyễn, Văn Hà Đỗ

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical characteristics, radiographic features, and surgical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis using a kinematic knee prosthesis at Viet Duc University Hospital from June 2024 to June 2025. Subjects and Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional descriptive study without a control group was conducted on 45 patients with varus deformity due to knee osteoarthritis who underwent TKA using a kinematic knee prosthesis at Viet Duc University Hospital from June 2024 to June 2025. Results: The average age of patients with varus knee osteoarthritis ranged from 60 to 69 years, with a predominance of females. The most common symptom was pain during ambulation (77.8%), and the mean range of motion was 105 ± 8.3 degrees. Clinically, varus deformity associated with flexion contracture was most common (55.8%). On radiographs, grade IV osteoarthritis accounted for 84.4%, while mild varus deformity (3°-<10°) was most frequent (55.5%), and severe deformity (≥20°) accounted for 6.7%. Postoperatively, the lower limb mechanical axis improved significantly by 9.1 ± 2.9. Clinical and functional outcomes of the knee improved significantly after surgery, with a Knee Score (KS) of 84.3 ± 3.6 and a Knee Function Score (KFS) of 85.4 ± 5.3. Conclusion: Total knee arthroplasty using a kinematic knee prosthesis achieved a neutral mechanical axis postoperatively. Knee function, pain level, and range of motion improved significantly compared to preoperative status.

Article Details

References

1. Bourne R, Chesworth B, Davis A, Mahomed N, Charron K. Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Who is Satisfied and Who is Not? Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2009;468:57-63. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9
2. Nisar S, Palan J, Rivière C, Emerton M, Pandit H. Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5(7):380-390. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.5.200010
3. Dossett HG, Arthur JR, Makovicka JL, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Kinematically and Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasties: Long-Term Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(6S):S209-S214. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.065
4. Thienpont E, Parvizi J. A New Classification for the Varus Knee. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(10):2156-2160. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.034
5. Sharma L, Song J, Felson DT, Cahue S, Shamiyeh E, Dunlop DD. The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. JAMA. 2001;286(2):188-195. doi:10.1001/jama.286.2.188
6. Lording T, Lustig S, Neyret P. Coronal alignment after total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2016;1(1):12-17. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.1.000002
7. Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):45-53. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1936-5
8. Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN. The New Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):3-19. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2135-0
9. (PDF) The Effect of Severe Varus Deformity on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Mechanical Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with Medial Stabilizing Technique. ResearchGate. Published online October 12, 2025. doi:10.3390/jcm13061595
10. Treatment of Severe Varus Deformity in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty using Metal Augment. ResearchGate. doi:10.21608/zumj.2025.367865.3878