CLINICAL AND TOMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF KERATOCONUS EYES INDICATED FOR CORNEAL CROSS-LINKING

Tú Nga Nguyễn1, , Hoàng Việt Chi Vũ2, Thị Quế Anh Vũ1, Thị Hiền Phạm3
1 Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội
2 Bệnh viện Mắt Hà Nội
3 Bệnh viện Mắt Hà Nam

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics and corneal parameters measured by Pentacam in keratoconus cases indicated for corneal cross-linking (CXL).


Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 17 eyes with keratoconus from 10 patients indicated for CXL at Hanoi Eye Hospital 2 from August 2024 to August 2025. Clinical features, visual acuity, refractive status, and corneal parameters obtained from Pentacam were collected and analyzed using SPSS 20.0.


Results: The mean age was 20.8 ± 5.55 years, with the majority of cases in the 19–30 age group (70.0%). The male-to-female ratio was 1.5:1. A total of 64.7% of eyes showed no typical clinical signs. Among eyes with clinical manifestations, the common findings were Fleischer ring (35.3%) and Vogt’s striae (29.4%). The mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.51 ± 0.43 LogMAR. A high degree of astigmatism was observed, with a mean astigmatism of -5.38 ± 4.10 D, and 76.5% of eyes having astigmatism ≥ 3 D. Tomographic parameters measured by Pentacam demonstrated marked corneal abnormalities, with a mean Kmax of 57.31 ± 9.17 D. The thinnest corneal thickness was 465.12 ± 42.98 µm. The BAD-D (Belin/Ambrosio deviation) index, which integrates anterior and posterior elevation as well as corneal thickness distribution, had a mean value of 9.43 ± 4.58, exceeding the normal threshold.


Conclusion: Keratoconus cases indicated for corneal cross-linking are predominantly observed in young individuals and often lack obvious clinical signs on examination. Diagnosis, assessment of disease progression, and evaluation of treatment outcomes should be based on a combination of multiple parameters, particularly corneal tomography indices obtained from Pentacam.

Article Details

References

1. Ambrósio Jr R, Caiado ALC, Guerra FP, et al. Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(10):753-758.
2. Enders C, Vogel D, Dreyhaupt J, et al. Corneal cross-linking in patients with keratoconus: up to 13 years of follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023;261(4):1037-1043.
3. Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, et al. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea. 2015;34(4):359-369.
4. Asimellis G, Kaufman EJ. Keratoconus. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
5. Li X, Yang H, Rabinowitz YS. Longitudinal study of keratoconus progression. Exp Eye Res. 2007;85(4):502-507.
6. Naderan M, Shoar S, Rezagholizadeh F, Zolfaghari M, Naderan M. Characteristics and associations of keratoconus patients. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38(3):199-205.
7. Davis LJ, Schechtman KB, Wilson BS, et al. Longitudinal Changes in Visual Acuity in Keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(2):489-500.
8. Ferdi AC, Kandel H, Nguyen V, et al. Five-year corneal cross-linking outcomes: a Save Sight Keratoconus Registry study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2023;51(1):9-18.