COMPARISON OF VAULT PREDICTION RELIABILITY IN IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS SURGERY

Thị Thu Hương Bùi 1, , Tuấn Kiệt Huỳnh 1, Sỹ Sang Nguyễn 2, Tuấn Cường Huỳnh 3
1 Vietnam - Russian International Eye Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City
2 Eye Hospital of Ho Chi Minh City
3 Nguyen Tat Thanh University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: The vault (distance between the ICL and the crystalline lens) is a critical parameter determining the safety and efficacy of Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) surgery. Accurate preoperative vault prediction is essential for selecting the appropriate lens size to prevent complications such as cataract formation (low vault) or angle-closure glaucoma (high vault).


Objectives: To compare the reliability of the Nakamura-Kunimoto (NK) and Kojima-Sasaki (KS) formulas in predicting postoperative vault in patients undergoing EVO-ICL V5 surgery at Vietnam-Russia International Eye Hospital.


Methods: A retrospective case series study was conducted on 52 eyes of 26 patients who underwent EVO-ICL V5 implantation from July to September 2025. Predicted vaults calculated by the NK and KS formulas using CASIA2 were compared with actual achieved vaults measured at 1 month postoperatively. Accuracy was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Prediction Error (Bias), and paired t-test.


Results: The mean achieved vault was 646.6 ± 176.9 μm. The NK formula showed statistically significant underestimation (Bias -131.3 μm; p=0.004). The KS formula showed no significant difference from actual vault (Bias -62.7 μm; p=0.070). The MAE for KS (144.3 μm) was lower than NK (204.4 μm), representing a 29.4% improvement. Proportion achieving ideal vault (250-750 μm): KS 87.5%, NK 81.2%.


Conclusions: The KS formula demonstrated higher accuracy than the NK formula for predicting postoperative vault in ICL V5 surgery, particularly for the 12.6 mm lens size. The KS formula combined with CASIA2 AS-OCT is recommended for preoperative surgical planning.

Article Details

References

1. Sanders DR, Vukich JA. Comparison of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for low myopia. Cornea. 2006;25(10):1139-46.
2. Packer M. Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1059-77.
3. Gonvers M, Bornet C, Bovet J. Implantable contact lens for moderate to high myopia: relationship of vaulting to labeling, cataract, and intraocular pressure. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(12):2336-42.
4. Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, et al. Factors affecting vault after implantable collamer lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(6):1067-72.
5. Nakamura T, Isogai N, Kojima T, Yoshida Y, Sugiyama Y. Optimization of implantable collamer lens sizing based on swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(3):341-8.
6. Kojima T, Yokoyama S, Ito M, et al. Optimization of an implantable collamer lens sizing method using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(4):632-7.
7. Wu H, Zhang G, Qiu K, et al. Comparison of seven formula-based vault prediction methods for Implantable Collamer Lens. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024;108(4):589-95.
8. Ando W, Mori T, Tamaoki A, et al. Assessment of the Predictability of Vault After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography. Cornea. 2021;40(3):343-9.