CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND TRADITIONAL MEDICINE PATTERNS OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME AT THE MILITARY INSTITUTE OF TRADITIONAL MEDICINE IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2026
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics and traditional medicine syndromes of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) at the Military Institute of Traditional Medicine in 2026.
Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 105 patients diagnosed with CFS who were examined and treated at the Military Institute of Traditional Medicine during the first quarter of 2026.
Results: The mean age was 68.99 ± 11.35 years; the percentage of patients aged over 60 years were 79%. The female-to-male ratio was 2:1 (65% vs. 35%). Homemakers were the highest percentage with 48.6%, while non-manual workers were the lowest (7.6%). Most patients had CFS for more than 36 months (75.2%). The most common symptoms included substantial reduction in work or study capacity (93.3%), fatigue not substantially alleviated by rest (84.8%), post-exertional malaise following physical exertion (90.5%), and sleep disturbances (80%) were the most common symptoms, followed by decreased concentration (78.1%), unrefreshing sleep (77.1%), and dizziness upon prolonged standing (63.8%). Among traditional medicine patterns, heart-spleen deficiency was the most prevalent (35.2%), followed by liver-kidney yin deficiency (30.5%), and spleen-kidney yang deficiency was the least common (3.8%).
Conclusion: Most CFS patients treated at the Military Institute of Traditional Medicine in the first quarter of 2026 were elderly, had a long duration of illness, and often had comorbid cardiovascular diseases, with a heart-spleen deficiency pattern.
Keywords
Chronic fatigue syndrome, clinical characteristics, traditional medicine
Article Details
References
2. Global, regional, and national burden of multiple sclerosis 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(3). doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30443-5
3. Li Yuxiao, Yang Jingya, Chau lan Chi, et al. Is there a role for traditional and complementary medicines in managing chronic fatigue? a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1266803. doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1266803
4. Trần Thị Thu Thủy. Đánh Giá Tác Dụng Điều Trị Của Cao Lỏng TQMB Trên Bệnh Nhân Hư Lao Thể Tỳ Khí Hư. Luận văn Thạc sĩ. Y Hà Nội; 2021.
5. Viên Uyển Lệ; Khang Minh Tường; Ngô Trí Huệ; Dụ Bình. Nghiên cứu lâm sàng về tiêu chuẩn phân loại biện chứng trong Y học cổ truyền đối với Hội chứng mệt mỏi mạn tính. Tạp chí Y học cổ truyền Trung Quốc Thiểm Tây. 2009; 30(05):515-517
6. Vahratian A, Lin JMS, Bertolli J, Unger ER. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Adults: United States, 2021-2022. National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.). National Health Interview Survey (NHIS); 2023. doi:10.15620/cdc:134504
7. Inger Johanne Bakken, Kari Tveito, Nina Gunnes, et al. Two age peaks in the incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: a population-based registry study from Norway 2008-2012. BMC Med. 2014;12. doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0167-5
8. Rowe PC, Barron DF, Calkins H, Maumenee IH, Tong PY, Geraghty MT. Orthostatic intolerance and chronic fatigue syndrome associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J Pediatr. 1999;135(4). doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70173-3