RESULTS OF VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY IN EMERGENCY ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION FOR PATIENTS WITH RESPIRATORY FAILURE AT MILITARY HOSPITAL 175

Đức Thành Bùi 1,
1 Military Hospital 175

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in patients with respiratory failure at Military Hospital 175 and to identify associated factors. Subjects and Methods: A prospective, descriptive, analytical study was conducted on 79 patients with respiratory failure requiring emergency endotracheal intubation. All patients underwent endotracheal intubation using a video laryngoscope at Military Hospital 175 from October 2023 to October 2025. Results: Among 79 patients, 60.8% were male, with a mean age of 58.6 ± 15.2 years. The most common cause of respiratory failure was pneumonia (43.0%). The overall intubation success rate was 97.5%, with a first-pass success rate of 83.5%. Most patients had favorable laryngeal views, with Cormack–Lehane grades I–II accounting for 94.9%. The mean intubation time was 36.8 ± 18.5 seconds. The complication rate was 25.3%, with hypoxemia (SpO₂ decrease) being the most frequent (12.7%). Factors associated with reduced first-pass success included Mallampati class III–IV, pre-intubation SpO₂ < 90%, crash emergency situations, and the presence of ≥2 predictors of difficult airway (p < 0.05). A duration of ≤30 seconds is associated with a higher likelihood of success (OR = 5.12; p = 0.016). Conclusion: Video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation demonstrated a high success rate. Outcomes were associated with airway characteristics, pre-intubation oxygenation status, and emergency conditions. A short execution time is associated with first-attempt success.

Article Details

References

1. Jaber S, Amraoui J, Lefrant J-Y, Arich C, Cohendy R, Landreau L, et al. Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2355–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000233879.58720.87
2. Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, Walker C, Stolz U. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20:71–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12055
3. Mosier JM, Whitmore SP, Bloom JW, Snyder LS, Graham LA, Carr GE, et al. Video laryngoscopy improves intubation success and reduces esophageal intubations compared to direct laryngoscopy in the medical intensive care unit. Crit Care. London, England; 2013;17:R237. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13061
4. Lascarrou JB, Boisrame-Helms J, Bailly A, Le Thuaut A, Kamel T, Mercier E, et al. Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy on Successful First-Pass Orotracheal Intubation Among ICU Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317:483–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.20603
5. Hypes CD, Stolz U, Sakles JC, Joshi RR, Natt B, Malo J, et al. Video Laryngoscopy Improves Odds of First-Attempt Success at Intubation in the Intensive Care Unit. A Propensity-matched Analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13:382–90. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201508-505OC
6. Ruiz FMP, Cruz IA, Cruz DC, Pérez LL, Cruz AC. Rapid sequence intubation. Emergencias. 2012;24:397–409.
7. Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984;39:1105–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb08932.x