ĐẶC ĐIỂM LÂM SÀNG, CẬN LÂM SÀNG CỦA BỆNH NHÂN SỐC PHẢN VỆ KHÔNG ĐÁP ỨNG VỚI THUỐC VẬN MẠCH - CƯỜNG TIM LIỀU CAO ĐIỀU TRỊ TẠI BỆNH VIỆN QUÂN Y 175

Đức Thành Bùi 1,
1 Military Hospital 175

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical and paraclinical characteristics of patients with refractory anaphylactic shock unresponsive to high-dose vasopressor and inotropic therapy at Military Hospital 175.


Subjects and Methods: A prospective descriptive study with analytical components was conducted on 54 patients diagnosed with refractory anaphylactic shock unresponsive to high-dose vasopressor and inotropic therapy at Military Hospital 175 from December 2022 to October 2025.


Results: Among 54 patients, 59.3% were male, and the mean age was 56.2 ± 17.8 years. The leading cause was drug-induced anaphylaxis (51.9%), and 55.6% of cases occurred in the hospital setting. All patients presented with hypotension, and 75.9% developed respiratory failure. The mean lactate level was 5.6 ± 2.3 mmol/L, and mean arterial pH was 7.28 ± 0.08. All patients required two or more vasopressor agents, 70.4% required invasive mechanical ventilation, and the mortality rate was 24.1%. Lactate > 6 mmol/L, SpO₂ < 90%, and absence of cutaneous manifestations were significantly associated with mortality (p < 0.05).


Conclusion: Refractory anaphylactic shock unresponsive to high-dose vasopressor and inotropic therapy is characterized by severe clinical manifestations, frequently requiring advanced organ support, and is associated with a substantial mortality rate. Lactate > 6 mmol/L, SpO₂ < 90%, and absence of cutaneous signs are significant predictors of mortality.

Article Details

References

1. Pouessel G, Dribin TE, Tacquard C, Tanno LK, Cardona V, Worm M, et al. Management of Refractory Anaphylaxis: An Overview of Current Guidelines. Clin Exp Allergy. 2024;54:470–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.14514
2. Jentzer JC, Vallabhajosyula S, Khanna AK, Chawla LS, Busse LW, Kashani KB. Management of Refractory Vasodilatory Shock. Chest. 2018;154:416–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.12.021
3. Bộ Y tế. Thông tư 51/2017/TT-BYT “hướng dẫn phòng, chẩn đoán và xử trí phản vệ. 2017.
4. Vũ Tuấn Dũng, Nguyễn Duy Tú. Đặc điểm lâm sàng và kết quả điều trị phản vệ tại Khoa cấp cứu Bệnh viện Đa khoa Sóc Sơn năm 2024. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2026;559:338–43. https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v559i2.17611
5. Francuzik W, Dölle-Bierke S, Knop M, Scherer Hofmeier K, Cichocka-Jarosz E, García BE, et al. Refractory Anaphylaxis: Data From the European Anaphylaxis Registry. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02482
6. Simons FER, Ardusso LRF, Bilò MB, El-Gamal YM, Ledford DK, Ring J, et al. World Allergy Organization Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Anaphylaxis. World Allergy Organ J. 2011;4:13–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/WOX.0b013e318211496c
7. Pouessel G, Deschildre A, Dribin TE, Ansotegui IJ, Cardona V, Chinthrajah RS, et al. Refractory Anaphylaxis: A New Entity for Severe Anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023;11:2043–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2023.04.037
8. Dewachter P, Savic L. Perioperative anaphylaxis: pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management. BJA Educ. 2019;19:313–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2019.06.002