FUNCTIONAL AND AESTHETIC OUTCOMES AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT OF MARKOWITZ - MANSON TYPE I-II NASO - ORBITO - ETHMOIDAL FRACTURES

Thị Kiều Thơ Nguyễn1,2, , Hồng Ân Đỗ3, Đình Chương Nguyễn1,2, Đình Nguyên Phạm4
1 Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
2 Bệnh viện Nhân Dân Gia Định
3 Bệnh viện 175
4 Bệnh viện Nhi Đồng 1

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate 3-month functional and aesthetic outcomes after surgical treatment of Markowitz–Manson type I–II naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) fractures.


Methods: This descriptive study with postoperative longitudinal follow-up included 38 patients with type I–II NOE fractures who underwent surgery at two clinical centres between June 2024 and May 2025. Outcomes included raw NOSE score (0–20), pain VAS, intercanthal distance (ICD), olfaction, ocular motility, facial aesthetics and complications. Preoperative and 3-month values were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.


Results: On CT, type I and type II injuries accounted for 18.4% and 81.6%, respectively; no type III injury was recorded. The mean NOSE score decreased from 15.50 ± 1.18 preoperatively to 1.55 ± 0.56 at 3 months (p < 0.001). Pain VAS decreased from 7.92 ± 0.63 to 0.66 ± 0.63 (p < 0.001). At 3 months, all patients had ICD <35 mm and normal ocular motility. Satisfactory facial symmetry, nasal bone alignment and endoscopic middle-meatal patency were each achieved in 94.7%. No vision loss, facial nerve injury or plate extrusion was observed.


Conclusion: In Markowitz–Manson type I–II NOE fractures, individualized surgical management was associated with improvement in nasal function, pain and ICD at 3 months, with favourable aesthetic results and a low complication rate. Findings should not be generalized to more complex type III injuries.

Article Details

References

1. Phan Văn Anh, Nguyễn Hồng Hà, Lê Văn Nam. Đặc điểm tổn thương trên cắt lớp vi tính ở bệnh nhân gãy mũi sàng ổ mắt tại Bệnh viện Hữu Nghị Việt Đức. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2021;507(1):145-149. doi:10.51298/vmj.v507i1.1343.
2. Conti KR, Bhat AM, Nguyen SA, Rohloff R, Keeler JA. Outcomes of surgical repair of adult naso-orbital-ethmoid fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2025;135(3):991-999. doi:10.1002/lary.31805.
3. Epstein S, Ettinger RE. Nasal and naso-orbito-ethmoid fractures. Semin Plast Surg. 2021;35(4):263-268. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1735791.
4. Gentile MA, Tellington AJ, Burke WJ, Jaskolka MS. Management of midface maxillofacial trauma. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21(1):69-95. doi:10.1016/j.cxom.2012.12.010.
5. Goh EZ, Bullis S, Beech N, Johnson NR. Surgical management of naso-orbito-ethmoidal fractures: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2024;138(1):9-20. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2024.02.021.
6. Leader P, Gal TJ. Naso-orbital-ethmoid fracture repair techniques: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024;82(4):461-467. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2023.12.015.
7. Markowitz BL, Manson PN, Sargent L, Vander Kolk CA, Yaremchuk M, Glassman D, et al. Management of the medial canthal tendon in nasoethmoid orbital fractures: the importance of the central fragment in classification and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(5):843-853. doi:10.1097/00006534-199105000-00005.
8. Pham AM, Strong EB. Endoscopic management of facial fractures. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;14(4):234-241. doi:10.1097/01.moo.0000233593.84175.6e.