FUNCTIONAL AND AESTHETIC OUTCOMES AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT OF MARKOWITZ - MANSON TYPE I-II NASO - ORBITO - ETHMOIDAL FRACTURES
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate 3-month functional and aesthetic outcomes after surgical treatment of Markowitz–Manson type I–II naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) fractures.
Methods: This descriptive study with postoperative longitudinal follow-up included 38 patients with type I–II NOE fractures who underwent surgery at two clinical centres between June 2024 and May 2025. Outcomes included raw NOSE score (0–20), pain VAS, intercanthal distance (ICD), olfaction, ocular motility, facial aesthetics and complications. Preoperative and 3-month values were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results: On CT, type I and type II injuries accounted for 18.4% and 81.6%, respectively; no type III injury was recorded. The mean NOSE score decreased from 15.50 ± 1.18 preoperatively to 1.55 ± 0.56 at 3 months (p < 0.001). Pain VAS decreased from 7.92 ± 0.63 to 0.66 ± 0.63 (p < 0.001). At 3 months, all patients had ICD <35 mm and normal ocular motility. Satisfactory facial symmetry, nasal bone alignment and endoscopic middle-meatal patency were each achieved in 94.7%. No vision loss, facial nerve injury or plate extrusion was observed.
Conclusion: In Markowitz–Manson type I–II NOE fractures, individualized surgical management was associated with improvement in nasal function, pain and ICD at 3 months, with favourable aesthetic results and a low complication rate. Findings should not be generalized to more complex type III injuries.
Keywords
Naso-orbito-ethmoidal fracture, NOE, Markowitz–Manson classification, NOSE, intercanthal distance, postoperative outcome
Article Details
References
2. Conti KR, Bhat AM, Nguyen SA, Rohloff R, Keeler JA. Outcomes of surgical repair of adult naso-orbital-ethmoid fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2025;135(3):991-999. doi:10.1002/lary.31805.
3. Epstein S, Ettinger RE. Nasal and naso-orbito-ethmoid fractures. Semin Plast Surg. 2021;35(4):263-268. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1735791.
4. Gentile MA, Tellington AJ, Burke WJ, Jaskolka MS. Management of midface maxillofacial trauma. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21(1):69-95. doi:10.1016/j.cxom.2012.12.010.
5. Goh EZ, Bullis S, Beech N, Johnson NR. Surgical management of naso-orbito-ethmoidal fractures: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2024;138(1):9-20. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2024.02.021.
6. Leader P, Gal TJ. Naso-orbital-ethmoid fracture repair techniques: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024;82(4):461-467. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2023.12.015.
7. Markowitz BL, Manson PN, Sargent L, Vander Kolk CA, Yaremchuk M, Glassman D, et al. Management of the medial canthal tendon in nasoethmoid orbital fractures: the importance of the central fragment in classification and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(5):843-853. doi:10.1097/00006534-199105000-00005.
8. Pham AM, Strong EB. Endoscopic management of facial fractures. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;14(4):234-241. doi:10.1097/01.moo.0000233593.84175.6e.