MESIODISTAL INCISOR DIMENSIONS, ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN PERMANENT INCISOR CROWDING AND OCCLUSION IN 8-10-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN IN HANOI

Thị Quỳnh Trang Hoàng1, , Đại Phong Nguyễn2, Hồng Dương Nguyễn3, Thị Hoan Mai2, Hải Anh Hà4, Minh Trí Phạm2, Văn Quang Nguyễn5, Đình Khởi Trương2
1 Nha khoa Quinn Dental
2 Trường Đại học Y Dược, Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội
3 Bệnh viện Nhiệt đới TW
4 Bệnh viện 198
5 Bệnh viện ĐK Nông nghiệp

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To determine permanent incisor mesiodistal dimensions, their associations with maxillary and mandibular incisor crowding and occlusion in 8-10-year-old children in Hanoi.

Subject and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 224 children aged 8-10 years. Permanent incisor mesiodistal dimensions and occlusal characteristics were assessed using three-dimensional digital models. Associations between incisor crowding, Angle malocclusion and the terminal relationship of the second primary molars were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests.

Results: The prevalence of incisor crowding was 52,68%. Boys exhibited significantly larger mesiodistal dimensions in several permanent incisors than girls (p<0,05). Incisor crowding was significantly associated with Angle malocclusion (p<0,001) with Angle Class II increasing the likelihood of crowding by 9,8-10,2-fold. Incisor crowding was also significantly associated with a mesial step terminal relationship in the maxilla and a distal step terminal relationship in both arches (p<0,01).

Conclusions: Incisor crowding is common in 8-10-year-old children, and mesiodistal dimensions of some permanent incisors exhibit sex differences. Incisor crowding is significantly associated with Angle malocclusion and the terminal relationship of the second primary molars, particularly Angle Class II and specific terminal plane relationships. These findings may facilitate early identification of children at risk for crowding and support interceptive orthodontic treatment during the mixed dentition stage.

Article Details

References

1. Shetty VO et al. Assessment of factors associated with mandibular anterior crowding in mixed dentition. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(3):S2608-S2614.
2. Carneiro DPA et al. Esthetic impact of maxillary midline diastema and mandibular crowding in children in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161(3):390-395.
3. Daoud R et al. Implications of permanent teeth dimensions and arch lengths on dental crowding during the mixed dentition period. Appl Sci. 2021;11(17):8004.
4. Sharma K et al. Factors for crowding in the early mixed dentition stage. Univ J Dent Sci. 2020;6(3):45-50.
5. Lin TW et al. Impact of Invisalign First system on molar width and incisor torque in malocclusion during the mixed dentition period. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(27):e38742.
6. Kim Y et al. Reliability of mixed dentition space analysis using a digital model obtained from an optical impression: a preliminary study. BMC Res Notes. 2024;17:12.
7. Kandakkeel FN et al. Assessment of dental crowding occurring in mixed dentition in maxillary and mandibular arches based on tooth size-arch length relationships and certain cephalometric parameters. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023;16(2):357-362.
8. Nadda P et al. To evaluate the relationship between maxillary and mandibular base lengths with dental crowding in different skeletal malocclusions. J Indian Orthod Soc. 2024;58(3):303-313.