DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE DETECTION OF URETERAL STONES AT HAI PHONG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Văn Long Nguyễn1,2, Thị Yến Lê1,2, , Bảo Trân Nguyễn1, Thị Thuý Hiếu Nguyễn1,2, Văn Điều Nguyễn3
1 Trường Đại học Y Dược Hải Phòng
2 Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hải Phòng
3 Học viện Quân Y

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography in detecting ureteral stones at Hai Phong Medical University Hospital.

Materials and Methods: A descriptive case series study was conducted on 166 patients with ureteral stones confirmed by computed tomography, all of whom underwent both ultrasonography and CT at Hai Phong Medical University Hospital between January 2024 and March 2025. The diagnostic performance of ultrasonography was assessed in terms of sensitivity and specificity according to stone location, stone size, and indirect signs, using CT as the reference standard.

Results: Among 166 patients, 71.08% were male, with a mean age of 47.9 ± 14.47 years. Ultrasonography detected ureteral stones in 72.29% of cases. Diagnostic performance varied by stone location, with the highest sensitivity observed for stones in the upper ureter (sensitivity: 80.33%; specificity: 98.10%), followed by stones in the distal ureter (68.13%; 100%) and stones in the mid ureter (64.29%; 91.45%). According to stone size, the sensitivity of ultrasonography was 88.46% for stones >5 mm and 61.45% for stones measuring 3–5 mm; no stones smaller than 3 mm were detected by ultrasonography.

Ultrasonography showed high sensitivity in detecting hydronephrosis and ureteral dilatation (93.98%), whereas sensitivity for periureteral infiltration was low (9.80%) but specificity was high (97.39%). There was no statistically significant difference between stone size measured by ultrasonography and CT (p > 0.05), with a moderate correlation (r = 0.594; p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Ultrasonography demonstrates good diagnostic performance in the evaluation of ureteral stones, particularly for larger stones and those located in the upper ureter. It shows high sensitivity in detecting indirect signs of obstruction but is limited in identifying small stones and periureteral inflammatory changes. Ultrasonography can be used as an initial imaging modality to guide diagnosis and may reduce the need for CT in selected cases.

Article Details

References

1. Bộ môn Ngoại, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội (2021), Sỏi tiết niệu. Trong: Bài giảng bệnh học ngoại khoa. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Y học, tr. 266–286.
2. Sorokin, I. et al. (2017) ‘Epidemiology of stone disease across the world’, World Journal of Urology, 35(9), pp. 1301–1320.
3. Liu, Y. et al. (2018) ‘Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Asia’, Asian Journal of Urology, 5(4), pp. 205–214.
4. Andrabi, Y. et al. (2015) ‘Advances in CT imaging for urolithiasis’, Indian Journal of Urology, 31(3), pp. 185–193.
5. Nguyễn Phước Bảo Quân (2017) ‘Hệ tiết niệu’, trong Siêu âm bụng tổng quát. Huế: Nhà xuất bản Đại học Huế, tr. 496–521.
6. Trịnh Hoàng Giang (2021) Nghiên cứu kết quả điều trị sỏi niệu quản bằng phương pháp tán sỏi nội soi ngược dòng sử dụng laser. Luận án tiến sĩ, Đại học Y Hà Nội.
7. Nguyễn Thị Mến (2021) Nhận xét tình trạng bệnh nhân mắc sỏi tiết niệu điều trị nội trú tại khoa Thận tiết niệu Bệnh viện Bạch Mai. Khóa luận tốt nghiệp, Đại học Y Hà Nội.
8. Ahmed, F. et al. (2018) ‘The role of ultrasonography in detecting urinary tract calculi compared to CT scan’, Research and Reports in Urology, 10, pp. 199–203.
9. Alahmadi, A.E. et al. (2020) ‘The gap between ultrasonography and computed tomography in measuring the size of urinary calculi’, Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(9), pp. 4925–4928.