OUTCOME EVALUATION AND RISK STRATIFICATION FOR SYMPTOMATIC HYDRONEPHROSIS IN PREGNANCY: A CLINICAL SCORING SYSTEM DEVELOPED AT GIA DINH PEOPLE’S HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Symptomatic hydronephrosis in pregnancy (SHP) remains a significant clinical challenge due to the risk of severe complications, including septic shock, acute kidney injury, and adverse obstetric outcomes. The choice between conservative management and urological intervention lacks a universal consensus, necessitating a dedicated risk stratification tool to support clinical decision-making.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 118 pregnant women hospitalized for SHP at Gia Dinh People’s Hospital from January 2017 to June 2025. Patients were categorized into two groups: conservative management (n=106) and Double-J (DJ) stenting (n=12). Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and t-tests where appropriate. Univariate and multivariate Firth’s Logistic regression models were employed to identify independent predictors for intervention. The SHIP score was developed and validated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value.
Results: The mean maternal age was 30,3 ± 5,6 years, and the mean gestational age was 23,2 ± 6,9 weeks, predominantly occurring in the second and third trimesters (88.2%). Flank pain was the most prevalent clinical symptom (93.2%). The rate of urinary tract infection (UTI) was 45.8%, with Escherichia coli as the primary pathogen (80%), 25.0% of which were Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing strains. Urolithiasis was identified in 43.2% of cases, and pathological hydronephrosis accounted for 25.0%. Conservative management was successful in 89.8% of cases, while 10.2% required DJ stenting. Independent predictors for intervention included: fever ≥ 38oC, ureteral stones, and hydronephrosis ≥ grade II. The SHIP score demonstrated high predictive performance with an AUC of 0.857 (95% CI: 0,751 – 0,964), facilitating the classification of patients into three risk groups for tailored management.
Conclusion: While the majority of hydronephrosis in pregnancy is physiological and responds well to conservative treatment, a significant proportion involves pathological conditions such as ureteral stones and UTIs that require early intervention. The SHIP score is a valuable clinical tool for risk stratification, enabling timely management to minimize hazardous complications for both mother and fetus.
Keywords
Symptomatic hydronephrosis in pregnancy, urinary tract obstruction, urinary tract infection, Double-J stent, predictive model
Article Details
References
2. Haberal HB, Tonyali S. Factors predicting the need for surgical intervention for hydronephrosis during pregnancy: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;309(5):1801-6. Epub 20240227. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07391-8. PubMed PMID: 38413423.
3. Demiroğlu Ç, Solakhan M. Hydronephrosis in pregnancy: Critical factors determining urinary catheter use. Obstet Med. 2025:1753495x251332667. Epub 20250624. doi: 10.1177/1753495x251332667. PubMed PMID: 40575579; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC12187711.
4. Phan ML, Nguyen VA. Evaluation of the results of diagnosis and management of infected pregnancy hydronephrosis in Binh Dan Hospital. Ho Chi Minh City Journal of Medicine. 2018;22(Suppl 1):168–73.
5. Di Bello F, Califano G, Morra S, Ruvolo CC, Fraia A, Pezone G, et al. Urological Challenges during Pregnancy: Current Status and Future Perspective on Ureteric Stent Encrustation. J Clin Med. 2024;13(13). Epub 20240703. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133905. PubMed PMID: 38999471; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC11242795.
6. Zhang S, Liu G, Duo Y, Wang J, Li J, Li C. Application of Ureteroscope in Emergency Treatment with Persistent Renal Colic Patients during Pregnancy. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146597. Epub 20160111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146597. PubMed PMID: 26751955; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4709194.
7. Chung D, Ramjiawan R, Hosier G. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-assisted bedside ureteric stent placement A prospective, single-institution study. Can Urol Assoc J. 2024;18(8):234-8. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8880. PubMed PMID: 39151158; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC11326730.
8. He M, Lin X, Lei M, Xu X, He Z. The identification of pregnant women with renal colic who may need surgical intervention. BMC Urol. 2022;22(1):30. Epub 20220307. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-00985-x. PubMed PMID: 35255882; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8903555.