EVALUATION OF EMERGENCY SPLENECTOMY FOR BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMA AT MILITARY HOSPITAL 103

Sơn Hải Đỗ1, , Văn Quang Nguyễn2, Nguyễn Song Toàn Trần1, Chí Thanh Hồ1, Thị Diệu Liên Nguyễn3, Văn Thành Nguyễn1, Bá Thành Lại1, Thọ Thắng Tống1
1 Bệnh viện Quân y 103, Học viện Quân y
2 Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội 108
3 Bệnh viện Đa khoa Hà Đông

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Among solid organ injuries caused by blunt abdominal trauma, splenic rupture is the most frequent presentation, predominantly occurring within multi-trauma contexts with acute clinical courses and substantial mortality risks.


Objective: To investigate and analyze the clinical outcomes of emergency splenectomy in managing traumatic splenic rupture.


Subjects and methods: A retrospective and prospective cross-sectional descriptive study was performed on a cohort of 116 patients with blunt abdominal trauma resulting in splenic rupture who underwent splenectomy at Military Hospital 103 between January 2019 and December 2025.


Results: Out of 116 surgically treated cases, emergency operative indications accounted for 38.8%. Splenic injuries graded by anatomic severity revealed Grade III at 4.3%, Grade IV at 75,9%, and Grade V at 19.8%. Coexisting intra-abdominal injuries included pancreatic trauma (22.4%), left renal rupture (4.3%), and jejunal laceration (1.7%). Postoperative complications were recorded in 14.6% of the cohort, specifically pancreatic fistula (11.2%), residual intra-abdominal abscess (1.7%), and deep vein thrombosis (1.7%). Overall clinical outcomes at discharge were rated as Good (84.5%), Moderate (11.2%), and Poor including mortality (4.3%). Multivariate analysis indicated that recovery success was highly correlated with the urgency of surgical admission and the presence of associated visceral injuries (p < 0.05).


Conclusion: Splenectomy remains a critical, life-saving intervention demonstrating high therapeutic success (84.5%). Given that traumatic splenic rupture frequently presents alongside complex adjacent organ damage, such as to the pancreas and kidney, rapid diagnostic workup and decisive surgical timing are paramount to optimizing patient survival and reducing morbidity.

Article Details

References

1. Mader MM, Lefering R, Westphal M et al. (2022), “Traumatic brain injury with concomitant injury to the spleen: characteristics and mortality of a high-risk trauma cohort from the TraumaRegister DGU®”, Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 48(6), pp. 4451-4459.
2. Lee JT, Slade E, Uyeda J et al. (2021), “American Society of Emergency Radiology Multicenter Blunt Splenic Trauma Study: CT and Clinical Findings”, Radiology, 299(1), pp. 122-130.
3. Bège T, Brunet C, Berdah SV (2014), “Management of splenic trauma”, Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 38(6), pp. 682-688.
4. Coccolini F, Montori G, Catena F, et al. (2017), “Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients”, World J Emerg Surg, 12, 40.
5. Fransvea P, Costa G, Massa G, et al. (2019), “Non-operative management of blunt splenic injury: is it really so extensively feasible? A critical appraisal of a single-center experience”, Pan Afr Med J, 32.
6. McIntyre L K, Schiff M, Jurkovich GJ (2005), “Failure of nonoperative management of splenic injuries: causes and consequences”, Arch Surg, 140(6).
7. Lê Tư Hoàng (2009), Nghiên cứu ứng dụng nội soi ổ bụng trong chẩn đoán và điều trị chấn thương bụng kín, Luận án Tiến sĩ y học, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội.
8. Triệu Triều Dương, Nguyễn Cường Thịnh (2014), “Đánh giá kết quả điều trị phẫu thuật vỡ lách trong chấn thương bụng kín tại Bệnh viện TWQĐ 108”, Tạp chí Y Dược lâm sàng 108, 9(4), tr. 45-50.
9. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ, et al. (1995), “Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision)”, J Trauma, 38(3), pp. 323-324.
10. Trần Bình Giang, Nguyễn Lê Tú (2005), “Kết quả điều trị phẫu thuật chấn thương và vết thương lách”, Y học thực hành, (504), tr. 102-106.