OUTCOMES OF MICROSURGICAL VARICOCELECTOMY AT TAM ANH GENERAL HOSPITAL, HO CHI MINH CITY (2021 - 2025)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Varicocele affects 15–20% of adult males and 35–40% of men with primary infertility. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy is recommended by the EAU guidelines because of its low complication rate.
Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of microsurgical varicocelectomy regarding pain (VAS), semen parameters (WHO 2021), scrotal colour Doppler ultrasound findings and complication rates.
Methods: A retrospective descriptive study with single-point prospective follow-up of 68 patients operated on between January 2021 and December 2025. Pain group, n = 25; infertility group, n = 43, all azoospermic at baseline, confirmed on at least two centrifuged semen specimens per WHO 2021. Post-operative semen analysis was performed at ≥ 3 months. Pre- and post-operative values were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous variables and the McNemar test for the binary outcome; proportions are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: (1) VAS decreased from 5.36 ± 1.38 to 2.88 ± 1.45 (p < 0.001); 48.0% achieved ≥ 50% reduction. (2) Of 43 azoospermic patients, sperm appeared post-operatively in 72.1% (31/43; 95% CI 57.3–83.3; McNemar p < 0.001): cryptozoospermia 37.2%, density < 16 × 106/mL 20.9%, ≥ 16 × 106/mL 14.0%; 27.9% remained azoospermic; peak density reached 52 × 106/mL. (3) Doppler (n = 68): vein diameter 3.51 → 2.17 mm; Valsalva reflux 3.26 → 1.46 s; left testicular volume 12.45 → 13.97 mL (all p < 0.001). (4) Complications: recurrence 4.4%; hydrocele 1.5%; no surgical site infection or testicular atrophy.
Conclusion: Microsurgical varicocelectomy is safe, provides significant pain relief, improves Doppler parameters and induces sperm appearance in 72.1% of azoospermic patients. It is a valuable treatment option; larger prospective studies are warranted.
Keywords
Varicocele, microsurgical varicocelectomy, semen analysis, azoospermia, male infertility, VAS
Article Details
References
2. Agarwal A, Sharma R, Harlev A, Esteves SC. Effect of varicocele on semen characteristics according to the new 2010 WHO criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):163-170.
3. European Association of Urology. EAU Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health. Arnhem: EAU Guidelines Office; 2024.
4. Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, Dwosh J, Gnecco C. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol. 1992;148(6):1808-1811.
5. Han DY, Yang QY, Chen X, et al. Who will benefit from surgical repair for painful varicocele: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(7):1071-1078.
6. Kroese AC, de Lange NM, Collins J, Evers JLH. Surgery or embolization for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(10):CD000479.
7. Weedin JW, Khera M, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele repair in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2010;183(6):2309-2315.
8. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 6th ed. Geneva: WHO; 2021.