EVALUATION OF OCCLUSAL CHANGES BEFORE AND AFTER TREATMENT OF MYOFASCIAL PAIN IN TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS USING AN INTRAORAL SCANNER

Thị Thúy Hồng Bùi1, Thị Thu Hương Nguyễn1, , Thanh Tùng Khiếu1, Thanh An Trần1, Minh Sơn Tống1
1 Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate changes in pain intensity and occlusal contacts at the maximum intercuspal position (MIP) before and after treatment of primary myofascial pain in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) using an intraoral scanner.


Subjects and methods: A longitudinal observational study was conducted on 24 TMD patients with myofascial pain diagnosed according to the International Classification of Orofacial Pain 2020, indicated for stabilization splint therapy. Pain intensity (VAS) and occlusal parameters were evaluated using an intraoral scanner before and after treatment.


Results: Mean pain intensity (VAS) significantly decreased from 5.79 ± 1.74 to 1.67 ± 1.31 (p=0.000). The mean number of teeth with contacts at MIP significantly decreased from 15.83 ± 4.68 to 12.33 ± 3.73 (p=0.005). Occlusal contacts significantly reduced on the non-painful side (p=0.009) and in the premolar region (p=0.010); the proportion of patients with lateral occlusal interference tended to decrease from 70.83% to 58.33% but did not reach statistical significance (p=0.083); guidance patterns (87.5% group function, 12.5% canine guidance) remained unchanged post-treatment (p=1.000).


Conclusion: Treatment of myofascial TMD pain with a stabilization splint significantly reduces pain intensity and the total number of teeth with occlusal contacts at MIP. Guidance patterns do not change after treatment. The intraoral scanner is an effective and objective tool for quantitative occlusal evaluation.

Article Details

References

1. Kapos FP, Exposto FG, Oyarzo JF, Durham J. Temporomandibular disorders: a review of current concepts in aetiology, diagnosis and management. Oral Surg. 2020;13(4):321-334. doi:10.1111/ors.12473
2. Alqutaibi AY, Alhammadi MS, Hamadallah HH, et al. Global prevalence of temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2025;39(2):48-65. doi:10.22514/jofph.2025.025
3. Tournavitis A, Sandris E, Theocharidou A, et al. Effectiveness of conservative therapeutic modalities for temporomandibular disorders-related pain: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2023;81(4):286-297. doi:10.1080/00016357.2022.2138967
4. Kuzmanovic Pficer J, Dodic S, Lazic V, Trajkovic G, Milic N, Milicic B. Occlusal stabilization splint for patients with temporomandibular disorders: Meta-analysis of short and long term effects. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171296. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171296
5. International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 1st edition (ICOP). Cephalalgia. 2020;40(2):129-221. doi:10.1177/0333102419893823
6. Lâm LN, Vinh NP. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị rối loạn thái dương hàm bằng máng nhai tại Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ năm 2021 – 2022. Tạp chí Y học Cộng đồng. 2023;64(5). doi:10.52163/yhc.v64i5.786
7. Pohl TDP, Harhoff AC, Ries J, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Changes of the occlusal relationship in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) after manual therapy: a pilot study. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025;11(3):e70147. doi:10.1002/cre2.70147
8. Kumai T. Difference in chewing patterns between involved and opposite sides in patients with unilateral temporomandibular joint and myofascial pain-dysfunction. Arch Oral Biol. 1993;38(6):467-478. doi:10.1016/0003-9969(93)90182-L