TREATMENT OUTCOMES OF INTERMEDIATE-STAGE HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA WITH LENVATINIB COMBINED WITH TRANSARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION (TACE) AT HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Kiên Cường Mạc1, , Lê Huy Trịnh2, Đức Linh Trần1, Ngọc Cương Nguyễn3
1 Bệnh viện Hữu Nghị Việt Tiệp
2 Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội
3 Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a major health burden in Vietnam and is associated with high mortality. In patients with intermediate-stage disease (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] stage B) and high tumor burden, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone has limitations due to post-intervention tumor revascularization and cumulative deterioration of liver function.


Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined lenvatinib and TACE in patients with intermediate-stage HCC, based on tumor response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events.


Methods: This descriptive study included 40 patients treated at Hanoi Medical University Hospital. Lenvatinib was administered as a lead-in therapy for 14–21 days before the first TACE session, followed by repeat TACE as clinically indicated. Tumor response was assessed using mRECIST through serial computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), PFS, and adverse events graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0).


Results: The ORR was 62.5%, including a complete response rate of 7.5% and a partial response rate of 55.0%; the DCR was 90.0%. The median PFS was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.8–15.5). The combination regimen was generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being grade 1–2. The most common adverse events were fatigue (45.0%) and hypertension (42.5%), while grade ≥3 toxicities were uncommon.


Conclusion: The combination of lenvatinib and TACE demonstrated favorable tumor control and an acceptable safety profile in patients with intermediate-stage HCC. This treatment strategy may represent a feasible therapeutic option for patients with a high tumor burden.

Article Details

References

1. Luu, V. D., Tan, D. D., Thong, P. M., et al. (2026). Vietnamese expert consensus on the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with transarterial chemoembolization. Frontiers in Radiology, 6, 1763042.
2. Kudo, M., Ueshima, K., Saeki, I., et al. (2024). A phase 2, prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial of transarterial chemoembolization therapy in combination strategy with lenvatinib in patients with unresectable intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: TACTICS-L trial. Liver Cancer, 13(1), 99-112.
3. Kudo, M., Ueshima, K., Chan, S., et al. (2019). Lenvatinib as an initial treatment in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma beyond up-to-seven criteria and Child–Pugh A liver function: a proof-of-concept study. Cancers, 11(8), 1084.
4. Zhou, C., Chang, B., Xiang, Z., et al. (2024). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib versus TACE alone in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients beyond up-to-seven criteria: a retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis. Academic Radiology, 31(11), 4456-4465.
5. Kudo, M., Ren, Z., Guo, Y., et al. (2025). Transarterial chemoembolisation combined with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus dual placebo for unresectable, non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (LEAP-012): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. The Lancet, 405(10474), 203-215.
6. Nguyen-Dinh, S. H., Do, A., Pham, T. N. D., Dao, D. Y., Nguy, T. N., & Chen, M. S., Jr. (2018). High burden of hepatocellular carcinoma and viral hepatitis in Southern and Central Vietnam: Experience of a large tertiary referral center, 2010 to 2016. World Journal of Hepatology, 10(1), 116.
7. Kudo, M. (2019). A new treatment option for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with high tumor burden: initial lenvatinib therapy with subsequent selective TACE. Liver Cancer, 8(5), 299-311.
8. Lei, Y., Liang, X., Zhu, H., et al. (2025). Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization with or without programmed death-1 inhibitors in the treatment of intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Immunology, 16, 1586914.
9. Llovet, J. M., Vogel, A., Madoff, D. C., et al. (2022). Randomized phase 3 LEAP-012 study: transarterial chemoembolization with or without lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to curative treatment. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, 45(4), 405-412.
10. Taniki, N., Ojiro, K., Kasuga, R., et al. (2026). Advantage of scheduled upfront lenvatinib administration followed by transarterial chemoembolization therapy over lenvatinib monotherapy in patients with unresectable intermediate‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter cohort study. Cancer Medicine, 15(1), e71503.