PREGNANCY OUTCOMES AMONG WOMEN WITH HEART DISEASE DELIVERING IN THE THIRD TRIMESTER AT TU DU HOSPITAL

Trúc Anh Nguyễn1, , Minh Tuấn Võ2, Hữu Trung Nguyễn1, Ngọc Yến Oanh Nguyễn1, Việt Hùng Nguyễn1, Gia Đức Đinh1, Minh Thiên Trịnh1, Thị Thủy Phan1, Thị Minh Dương Võ1, Thị Việt Linh Nguyễn1
1 Bệnh viện Từ Dũ
2 Đại học Y Dược thành phố Hồ Chí Minh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe clinical characteristics and identify factors associated with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes among women with heart disease delivering at ≥28 weeks of gestation at Tu Du Hospital from January 2024 to December 2025.


Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 366 medical records of pregnant women with heart disease. Factors associated with adverse outcomes were identified using multivariable logistic regression.


Results: Arrhythmias were the most common cardiac disorder (38.8%), and 71.9% of women were classified as mWHO risk class I–II. Adverse outcomes occurred in 20.8% of mothers and 9.8% of neonates. Cardiomyopathy (aOR = 2.9) and mWHO class ≥II (aOR = 2.2) were independently associated with adverse maternal outcomes. Maternal white blood cell count ≥15.0 K/µL (aOR = 11.9), fetal growth restriction (aOR = 4.3), and preterm birth <37 weeks (aOR = 15.2) were independently associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Compared with the general obstetric population, women with heart disease had higher rates of preeclampsia, postpartum infection, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, and NICU admission (all p < 0.05).


Conclusion: Cardiomyopathy and mWHO class ≥II were independently associated with adverse maternal outcomes. Maternal white blood cell count ≥15.0 K/µL, fetal growth restriction, and preterm birth <37 weeks were independently associated with adverse neonatal outcomes.

Article Details

References

1. Justin Paul, G., et al., Pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease: the Madras Medical College Pregnancy And Cardiac (M-PAC) Registry from India. European Heart Journal, 2023. 44(17): p. 1530-1540.
2. ACOG, Committee Opinion No 700: Methods for Estimating the Due Date. Obstet Gynecol, 2017. 129(5): p. e150-e154.
3. Herman, D., et al., Composite adverse outcomes in obstetric studies: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2021. 21(1): p. 107.
4. De Backer, J., et al., 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J, 2025. 46(43): p. 4462-4568.
5. Partani, E., et al., Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Cardiovascular Disease:A Retrospective Cohort Study from Kaiser Permanente Northern California. The American Journal of Cardiology, 2026. 264: p. 7-13.
6. Svanvik, T., et al., Cardiovascular disease in pregnancy: Prevalence and obstetric outcomes in a Swedish population-based cohort study between 2000 and 2019. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. 103(12): p. 2401-2411.
7. Lees, C.C., et al., ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020. 56(2): p. 298-312.
8. Aracil Moreno, I., et al., Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Heart Disease: A Case—Control Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2024. 13(17): p. 5084.